Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TranspileMojo.java:262-267: Add concurrency tests for the... #2390

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #3090
Closed

TranspileMojo.java:262-267: Add concurrency tests for the... #2390

0pdd opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #3090

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Aug 14, 2023

The puzzle 2375-409ab48f from #2375 has to be resolved:

* @todo #2375:90min. Add concurrency tests for the TranspileMojo.cleanUpClasses method.
* We should be sure that the method works correctly in a concurrent environment.
* In order to do so we should add a test that will run the cleanUpClasses method in
* multiple threads and check that the method works correctly without exceptions.
* We can apply the same approach as mentioned in that post:
* <a href="https://www.yegor256.com/2018/03/27/how-to-test-thread-safety.html">Post</a>

The puzzle was created by rultor on 14-Aug-23.

Estimate: 90 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@l3r8yJ
Copy link
Contributor

l3r8yJ commented Apr 13, 2024

@maxonfjvipon ill take this one

@l3r8yJ
Copy link
Contributor

l3r8yJ commented Apr 13, 2024

blocked by #3088

@l3r8yJ l3r8yJ mentioned this issue Apr 14, 2024
l3r8yJ added a commit to l3r8yJ/eo that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2024
l3r8yJ added a commit to l3r8yJ/eo that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2024
@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Oct 29, 2024

The puzzle 2375-409ab48f has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants