Utilize STM stress test #464
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
CI summary: all 36 workflows passed! 🎉 |
|
CI summary for merge to
Out of 37 workflows 1 failed with a genuine error |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR extends the existing test suite to utilize the newly added
STMstress tests from #462 by triggering them for modules where we presently only have anSTMspec (and noLinone):To start off the Domain.DLS tests in a known good state (a fresh child Domain) the PR exposes
STM_domain.stress_prop_paras a parallel toSTM_domain.stress_test_par.For the latter, I realize I've tried to follow an unstated naming convention (
s/test/prop/)