Make the 5.3+ compiler packages depend on base-effects (effect syntax) #26543
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Octachron
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
|
Good catch, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While fixing ocaml-omake/omake#159 in opam-repository, i realised that package already conflicts with
base-effects(the meta package supposed to show the presence of theeffectsyntax)But that package is not linked with OCaml >= 5.3 which now has the
effectkeyword and syntax, so this PR makes OCaml >= 5.3 compilers depend on that meta package