Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add UAS (drone) tracking event: Remote ID Activity #1169

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonrau-at-queryai
Copy link
Contributor

Related Issue:

N/A

Description of changes:

As discussed in an OCSF meeting on 3 SEPT 2024 - there was a desire to bring IoT and drone/UAS related normalization into the schema.

This PR creates the Remote ID Activity Event which captures details from the Remote ID specific described in ASTM F3411-22a: Standard Specification for Remote ID and Tracking such as the specific UAS/drone platform, operating areas, the operator themselves, and other relevant information that could be captured or logged by dedicated Counter-UAS or UAS monitoring devices and software.

While a majority of the attributes were repurposed, several new attributes and objects were added into the dictionary to support modeling this.

@jonrau-at-queryai jonrau-at-queryai added enhancement New feature or request network_activity Issues related to Network Activity Category non_breaking Non Breaking, backwards compatible changes v1.4.0 or later Changes marked for versions beyond v1.3.0 of OCSF labels Sep 5, 2024
@irakledibm
Copy link
Contributor

I would suggest to rename it to drone_flights_activity, remote_id_activity as a name is not clear for anyone who is not working directly with drones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request network_activity Issues related to Network Activity Category non_breaking Non Breaking, backwards compatible changes v1.4.0 or later Changes marked for versions beyond v1.3.0 of OCSF
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants