-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #89 from official-stockfish/pull_no_pretty
Prefer operator<<() to pretty() No functional change.
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
29 additions
and
29 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
79fa72f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's cleaner to merge locally, rather than using GitHub's merge button. It avoids these extra merge commits, that make the commit log non linear and hard to follow.
Maybe non linear history is a feature, and deemed the right way by some git experts, but for me it makes the history hard to follow.
79fa72f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.