Skip to content

Representation of OSM relations #61

Answered by msbarry
Lychfindel asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks for reaching out! It looks like the logic ported from openmaptiles requires pedestrian areas to have area=yes tag to distinguish them from a looping path, but those are multipolygons which don't need an area tag to imply it's a polygon. Fixing this in #63

It seems to look right with that change:

Replies: 1 comment 7 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
7 replies
@Lychfindel
Comment options

@msbarry
Comment options

@Lychfindel
Comment options

@msbarry
Comment options

@Lychfindel
Comment options

Answer selected by Lychfindel
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants