Representation of OSM relations #61
-
Hi! Now for the real question! Do you have any hints why there is this difference and how I might resolve it? EDIT: I made a mistake while looking at the tiles in maputnik: using the tiles created with Planetiler all the multipolygons (or maybe the relations, I still have to understand) are missing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 7 replies
-
Thanks for reaching out! It looks like the logic ported from openmaptiles requires pedestrian areas to have It seems to look right with that change: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks for reaching out! It looks like the logic ported from openmaptiles requires pedestrian areas to have
area=yes
tag to distinguish them from a looping path, but those are multipolygons which don't need an area tag to imply it's a polygon. Fixing this in #63It seems to look right with that change: