-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add shorthand conc
#358
Conversation
Thank you @kecrily for your contribution! I like this idea! 👍 ToDo's:
|
@kecrily Would you like to work on the ToDo's mentioned above? |
I have updated the documentation and verified it. |
@gustavohenke Do you think we need to adjust something else? Also before merging this we should make sure the chosen alias fits well in the long term. For example, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm on limited computer time for a couple more weeks, so one thing I'd like to know is whether any alias will conflict with other popular/native OS tools.
From what I managed to test, it doesn't seem like a non-dev Mac has either conc
or cncr
.
It'd be good to know if an alias would conflict with tools on Windows or Linux too.
Also fwiw, concurrently used to have a concurrent
alias back before v4:
7383eca
I'll let you decide this one @paescuj 🙂
Thanks for your feedback @gustavohenke! Let's go with
That's a good point!
Interesting 😄 |
ed9f45a
to
6e02952
Compare
@gustavohenke Could you publish a new version as soon as you have time? |
Published as v7.4.0! |
concurrently
is too long, which makes it unfriendly to non-English users and tiresome to type, which discourages potential users.It simplifies the multiple-entry command
&&
, but not in the command line name. Let's add a shorthand to simplify it. Useconc
shorthand