Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: handle consolidated configuration change event #66

Merged

Conversation

skyerus
Copy link
Contributor

@skyerus skyerus commented Jan 3, 2023

This PR

Handles the consolidated configuration change event.

Related Issues

Fixes #64

Release in conjunction with open-feature/flagd#241

Notes

Follow-up Tasks

How to test

@skyerus skyerus force-pushed the issue-64_event-stream-consolidation branch from 7217c3c to 3d6d4fb Compare January 4, 2023 11:49
@skyerus skyerus marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2023 11:50
@james-milligan
Copy link
Collaborator

A linting issue has been flagged in the actions, but otherwise LGTM

ill look into why this hasn't caused a failure on the action

Signed-off-by: Skye Gill <[email protected]>
@beeme1mr beeme1mr self-requested a review January 6, 2023 14:10
@james-milligan james-milligan merged commit 69cb619 into open-feature:main Jan 6, 2023
@skyerus skyerus deleted the issue-64_event-stream-consolidation branch January 6, 2023 15:06
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2023
skyerus added a commit to open-feature/flagd that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
## This PR

Consolidates configuration change events into a singular event (avoid
superfluous bulk emissions).
Existing `configuration_change` event listeners will need to update
their handling to consume the singular events.

### Related Issues
<!-- add here the GitHub issue that this PR resolves if applicable -->

Fixes #238 

- [x] [Update
go-sdk-contrib](open-feature/go-sdk-contrib#66)
- [ ] Update java-sdk-contrib

### Notes
<!-- any additional notes for this PR -->

### Follow-up Tasks
<!-- anything that is related to this PR but not done here should be
noted under this section -->
<!-- if there is a need for a new issue, please link it here -->

### How to test
<!-- if applicable, add testing instructions under this section -->

Signed-off-by: Skye Gill <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE] EventStreamResponse consolidation
3 participants