Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify the specification for include directive #45

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rakhimov
Copy link
Member

  • Explore more alternative options: XInclude and multiple input files
  • Change the reasoning: portability and convenience
    (the performance gain is left implicit)
  • Clarify what "load" means: context-specific, implicit selective query
  • Clarify the resolution of relative paths
  • Allow easy automatic validation
    (each to-be-included file must be valid by itself against the schema)

Currently, the include directive can appear only
in fault-trees, components, model-data, and opsa-mef.
Therefore, wording is changed from "anywhere" to "specific places".

Closes #16

@cfolleau
Copy link
Member

@rakhimov You are totally right for Xinclude, Xinclude is XML standard, we should simply use it.

For people who don't know what it is: https://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/#basic-example
I am not for "reinventing the wheel".

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 20, 2017 via email

- Explore more alternative options: XInclude and multiple input files
- Change the reasoning: portability and convenience
  (the performance gain is left implicit)
- Clarify what "load" means: context-specific, implicit selective query
- Clarify the resolution of relative paths
- Allow easy automatic validation
  (each to-be-included file must be valid by itself against the schema)

Currently, the include directive can appear only
in fault-trees, components, model-data, and opsa-mef.
Therefore, wording is changed from "anywhere" to "specific places".
@rakhimov
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this in favor of #47

@rakhimov rakhimov closed this Apr 23, 2017
@rakhimov rakhimov deleted the include branch April 23, 2017 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants