Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add grpc creations test case to jaeger receiver #450

Merged

Conversation

huikang
Copy link
Member

@huikang huikang commented Dec 7, 2019

  • increase test coverage

Signed-off-by: Hui Kang [email protected]

Copy link
Contributor

@annanay25 annanay25 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Travis is failing with an unrelated error. Thanks for the changes @huikang! LGTM.

@tigrannajaryan
Copy link
Member

Please add an issue to fix the failing test if no such issue already exists.

@huikang
Copy link
Member Author

huikang commented Dec 9, 2019

@tigrannajaryan , the issue seems related to #41

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #450 into master will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #450      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.72%   75.79%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         120      120              
  Lines        7345     7345              
==========================================
+ Hits         5562     5567       +5     
+ Misses       1520     1516       -4     
+ Partials      263      262       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
receiver/jaegerreceiver/factory.go 97.75% <0%> (+5.61%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 87c4058...67b77de. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@pjanotti pjanotti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pjanotti
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @huikang could you please rebase this one?

Copy link
Contributor

@pjanotti pjanotti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pjanotti
Copy link
Contributor

@huikang something went wrong with CI could you please amend the commit and force push to rebuild it? Thanks.

- increase test coverage for tls

Signed-off-by: Hui Kang <[email protected]>
@huikang
Copy link
Member Author

huikang commented Jan 22, 2020

@huikang something went wrong with CI could you please amend the commit and force push to rebuild it? Thanks.

Done. Thanks.

@tigrannajaryan tigrannajaryan merged commit 9ecbe75 into open-telemetry:master Jan 23, 2020
hughesjj pushed a commit to hughesjj/opentelemetry-collector that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2023
…--config (open-telemetry#450)

* Allow setting both SPLUNK_CONFIG and --config with cmdline priority

* testutils: add Collector.WillFail(), connect Args, and specify config dynamically

* Add endtoend doc.go for integration-test target success
Troels51 pushed a commit to Troels51/opentelemetry-collector that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants