[chore] Clarify timeline strictness in stabilization issues. #9378
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9378 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.16% 90.17%
=======================================
Files 345 345
Lines 18025 18027 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 16253 16255 +2
Misses 1442 1442
Partials 330 330 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ labels: 'stabilization' | |||
| assignees: '' | |||
| --- | |||
|
|
|||
| Before stabilizing a module, an approver or maintainer must make sure that the following criteria have been met for at least two successive minor version releases: | |||
| Before stabilizing a module, an approver or maintainer must make sure that the following criteria have been met for at least two successive minor version releases (regardless of when this issue was opened): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess the thing that blocks us then is not the issue but doing the announcements on Slack/the Collector SIG meetings. Is it worth removing these and making a general announcement?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it worth removing these and making a general announcement?
Does these refer to opening these issues? We could probably get by with only the Milestones, but personally I like these issues as a helpful checklist and place for centralized stabilization discussion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think @mx-psi is saying that the longest wait is the announcements, because otherwise you'd be able to open the issue, check the checklist and see that for the last 2 releases, everything was done, and quickly move to stable. But you wouldn't really make announcements before opening the issue. So we could make a big announcement of our intentions in general, and dispense of announcing each module one by one.
I think after this wave, we could make a general announcement and remove the requirement, if we feel good about our progress.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup, exactly what Antoine said :) Thanks for clarifying my confusing message
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok yes that makes sense to me.
No description provided.