-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker to OpenTelemetry.ResourceDetector.Container #881
Conversation
@iskiselev could you please chek? |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #881 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 79.07% 79.48% +0.41%
==========================================
Files 182 182
Lines 5614 5629 +15
==========================================
+ Hits 4439 4474 +35
+ Misses 1175 1155 -20
|
Looks good to me. Thank you, @Kielek. I've raised small concern regards including ResourceDetector in this package name in #869. Let's confirm that we really want include it for this package (changing it from hosting-technology helper to only be resource detector) in the issue before merge. |
Project("{9A19103F-16F7-4668-BE54-9A1E7A4F7556}") = "OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker", "src\OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker\OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker.csproj", "{498A6808-C0DF-441F-A764-51A3BC4B8FC5}" | ||
Project("{9A19103F-16F7-4668-BE54-9A1E7A4F7556}") = "OpenTelemetry.ResourceDetector.Container", "src\OpenTelemetry.ResourceDetector.Container\OpenTelemetry.ResourceDetector.Container.csproj", "{498A6808-C0DF-441F-A764-51A3BC4B8FC5}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Kielek @iskiselev We discussed this name change in the SIG meeting yesterday (1/10).
While we're pretty confident this is a better name for this package, I'd like to hold on merging it for just a bit.
I'm compiling a list of packages whose names I believe should also change. I'd like to go through that exercise first before making a final decision on this package. I'd hate to change this package only to decide later we want to change it again.
Question: What do the two of you think about releasing the package once more under the old name OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker
so we can get the work from #839 released independent of the name change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alanwest , It is fine for me to release it without renaming.
If you want to wait a bit longer (more than a week o two), I would consider to close the PR for now and reopen when needed. Feel free to do it if you agree.
* Changes Update CHANGELOG for 1.1.0-beta.1 release, that will include CGroup V2 support (open-telemetry#839, open-telemetry#693). It still have `-beta.1` suffix to make it prerelease until decision on package name will be done (open-telemetry#881, open-telemetry#869)
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on. |
Fixes #869.
Changes
Rename OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker to OpenTelemetry.ResourceDetector.Container.
Label in repository changed from
comp:extensions.docker
tocomp:resourcedetector.container
From changelog
Going forward the NuGet package will be
OpenTelemetry.ResourceDetector.Container
.Older versions will remain at
OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker
(#881)
Migration:
using OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Docker.Resources
->using OpenTelemetry.ResourceDetector.Container
)and the class name (
DockerResourceDetector
toContainerResourceDetector
).For significant contributions please make sure you have completed the following items:
CHANGELOG.md
updated for non-trivial changes