Support configuration of cardinality limit in autoconfigure

[akats7]

This PR adds support for configuring the cardinality limit when using the autoconfigure package. The configured cardinality limit will be applied to the default registeredViews in the viewRegistry.

Test cases have been added to test if the cardinality has been properly applied to all default views.

Resolves #5639

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (ad6cbfc) 91.31% compared to head (e8d10b7) 91.31%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #5662   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     91.31%   91.31%           
- Complexity     4978     4980    +2     
=========================================
  Files           554      554           
  Lines         14731    14735    +4     
  Branches       1376     1376           
=========================================
+ Hits          13451    13455    +4     
  Misses          884      884           
  Partials        396      396           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
.../sdk/autoconfigure/MeterProviderConfiguration.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jack-berg]

Ah.. I should have coordinated with you 😞 #5659

[akats7]

Ah.. I should have coordinated with you 😞 #5659

Gotcha, I mentioned that I was planning on making the contribution in the description but should've assigned the issue to myself for clarity

[breedx-splk]

Dang. 🙃 These are remarkably similar implementations as well.

@akats7 If it's ok with you (no offense at all!), I would slightly prefer to go with Jack's PR because:

• Jack's includes update to the autoconfigure docs
• Your assert method is marked @Test which is unusual since it's also called by other test methods
• Jack's validates that the value is >= 1.

[akats7]

No worries, important thing is that the functionality is added. And yep the Test annotation is a typo lol

[jack-berg]

#5659 has been merged so I'm going to close this. Thanks anyway!