Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ioredis): fix instrumentation of ESM-imported ioredis #1694

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 17, 2023

Conversation

trentm
Copy link
Contributor

@trentm trentm commented Sep 21, 2023

  • With an ESM import the top-level object is a Module Namespace Object (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module-namespace-objects) that has no prototype. For compat, Node.js assigns the usual CommonJS module.exports to <module>.default, so use that when this is an ESM module.
  • Also, TypeScript translates class properties to assignments in the constructor after the super() call. Because super() can call init() and enable() synchronously, it calls back into 'IORedisInstrumentation' before 'traceSendCommand' was defined. Defining it as a method fixes that issue.

Fixes: #1692

Checklist

  • Decide whether and how to add a test for this.

- With an ESM import the top-level object is a Module Namespace Object
  (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module-namespace-objects) that has no
  prototype. For compat, Node.js assigns the usual CommonJS
  module.exports to `<module>.default`, so use that when this is
  an ESM module.
- Also, TypeScript translates class properties to assignments in the
  constructor after the super() call. Because super() can call init()
  and enable() synchronously, it calls back into
  'IORedisInstrumentation' before 'traceSendCommand' was defined.
  Defining it as a method fixes that issue.

Fixes: open-telemetry#1692
@trentm
Copy link
Contributor Author

trentm commented Sep 21, 2023

Note: I still have this in draft, because:

1. unit tests

I haven't added any unit tests for this. Adding a unit test for ESM is a little bit of work. I'd appreciate thoughts/suggestions from others. Options:

  1. Skip unit tests for this. ;)
  2. Have ioredis.test.ts spawn a separate process that runs a small ioredis-using .mjs file with the node --experimental-loader=... argument.
  3. Add a separate npm run test:esm similar to here: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/blob/f2fc0d8787a82f33b1ce7e315759ddc61caf4f52/experimental/packages/opentelemetry-instrumentation/package.json#L51-L53

2. lint

I was unable to npm run lint locally:

% npm run lint

> @opentelemetry/[email protected] lint
> eslint . --ext .ts

TypeError: Error while loading rule 'prettier/prettier': context.getPhysicalFilename is not a function
Occurred while linting /Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/src/index.ts
    at Object.create (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/node_modules/eslint-plugin-prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier.js:124:40)
    at createRuleListeners (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/linter/linter.js:746:21)
    at /Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/linter/linter.js:916:31
    at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
    at runRules (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/linter/linter.js:861:34)
    at Linter._verifyWithoutProcessors (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/linter/linter.js:1157:31)
    at Linter._verifyWithConfigArray (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/linter/linter.js:1255:21)
    at Linter.verify (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/linter/linter.js:1210:25)
    at Linter.verifyAndFix (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/linter/linter.js:1400:29)
    at verifyText (/Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis/node_modules/eslint/lib/cli-engine/cli-engine.js:230:48)

I don't know what that is about.

@trentm
Copy link
Contributor Author

trentm commented Sep 21, 2023

I've resolved lint... by manually pointing to the eslint installed at the top level:

$ cd plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis
$ ../../../node_modules/.bin/eslint . --ext .ts

FWIW, just running npm run lint in that dir breaks on, I think, prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier#434 because there is an old incompatible eslint installed in this sub-package dir because of a transitive dep of test-all-versions:

% npm ls eslint
@opentelemetry/[email protected] /Users/trentm/tm/opentelemetry-js-contrib2/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis
└─┬ [email protected]
  └─┬ [email protected]
    └─┬ [email protected]
...
      └── [email protected]

@trentm trentm marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2023 21:34
@trentm trentm requested a review from a team September 21, 2023 21:34
@Flarna
Copy link
Member

Flarna commented Sep 22, 2023

regarding the old eslint - this seems to be known issue since a while see here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1694 (cc31725) into main (659d7ba) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

❗ Current head cc31725 differs from pull request most recent head f6e6414. Consider uploading reports for the commit f6e6414 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1694   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.69%   91.70%           
=======================================
  Files         139      139           
  Lines        7139     7134    -5     
  Branches     1436     1437    +1     
=======================================
- Hits         6546     6542    -4     
+ Misses        593      592    -1     
Files Coverage Δ
...try-instrumentation-ioredis/src/instrumentation.ts 90.21% <85.71%> (-1.65%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@trentm
Copy link
Contributor Author

trentm commented Sep 22, 2023

regarding the old eslint - this seems to be known issue since a while see here.

@Flarna Oh. Thanks for chasing that down! I hadn't made the connection that this had to have been a "dependencies" entry. I'll see if I can get that fixed upstream.

@trentm
Copy link
Contributor Author

trentm commented Sep 22, 2023

I'll see if I can get that fixed upstream.

Fixed. [email protected] is published. Now if I:

$ cd plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-ioredis
$ npm update
$ npm ls parse-env-string  # verify it is at version 1.0.1

then npm run lint now works. \o/

Copy link
Member

@blumamir blumamir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

overall LGTM.
I never worked with ESM before, so would appreciate another review from someone with more knowledge (maybe @pichlermarc ?)

Is module[Symbol.toStringTag] === 'Module' the canonical way to test for ESM vs CJS?

@trentm
Copy link
Contributor Author

trentm commented Sep 25, 2023

Is module[Symbol.toStringTag] === 'Module' the canonical way to test for ESM vs CJS?

I'm not sure about it being canonical.

I touched briefly on this in an "Aside" section of this long comment: #1692 (comment)
Because the comment is long, it is easy to not see it.

By ECMAScript spec (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module-namespace-objects) the Module Namespace Object returned from an ESM import has a well-known symbol @@toStringTag value of "Module":

The initial value of the @@toStringTag property is the String value "Module".

That @@toStringTag symbol is represented by Symbol.toStringTag. This is what makes Object.prototype.toString.call() on a Number or Date include that name:

> var d = new Date()
undefined
> Object.prototype.toString.call(d)
'[object Date]'

It is spoofable:

% cat foobar.js
class FooBar {
  get [Symbol.toStringTag]() {
    return 'Module';
  }
}
module.exports = new FooBar();

% node
> var mod = require('./foobar.js')
> mod[Symbol.toStringTag]
'Module'

I'm not sure if we need to worry about that kind of spoofing -- accidental or intentional.


Another way to differentiate would be to pass in a thisIsESMFromImportInTheMiddle boolean from where the hookFn is setup for RITM vs IITM: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/blob/f2fc0d8787a82f33b1ce7e315759ddc61caf4f52/experimental/packages/opentelemetry-instrumentation/src/platform/node/instrumentation.ts#L244-L275 (I'm not suggesting that is the actual variable name. :)

(I'm not positive of the longevity of doing this. If I'm understanding recent changes in Node.js core (https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v20.6.0#new-nodemodule-api-register-for-module-customization-hooks-new-initialize-hook) we may eventually just have a single hook on a single Node.js core loader that handles loading both CommonJS and ESM.)

@pichlermarc
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure if we need to worry about that kind of spoofing -- accidental or intentional.

The decision from the SIG meeting: we have come to the conclusion that this being spoofed does not need to be considered at this point in time. We also came to the conclusion that this seems like the best way to test for ESM vs CJS.

@pichlermarc pichlermarc added bug Something isn't working priority:p1 Bugs which cause problems in end-user applications such as crashes, data inconsistencies labels Oct 12, 2023
@pichlermarc
Copy link
Member

1. unit tests

I haven't added any unit tests for this. Adding a unit test for ESM is a little bit of work. I'd appreciate thoughts/suggestions from others. Options:

1. Skip unit tests for this. ;)

🙂

2. Have ioredis.test.ts spawn a separate process that runs a small ioredis-using .mjs file with the `node --experimental-loader=...` argument.

Do you mean something like

import {IORedisInstrumentation} from "@opentelemetry/instrumentation-ioredis";
new IORedisInstrumentation()
import 'ioredis'
setTimeout(() => 0, 1000)

I think this could work as a start.

3. Add a separate `npm run test:esm` similar to here: [open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js@`f2fc0d8`/experimental/packages/opentelemetry-instrumentation/package.json#L51-L53](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/blob/f2fc0d8787a82f33b1ce7e315759ddc61caf4f52/experimental/packages/opentelemetry-instrumentation/package.json#L51-L53)

That would also work, yes. I think the tests in @opentelemetry/instrumentation are completely separate ones so they don't test all the same things the CJS tests test do. But I think a simple test like this or the one from 2. would work to get this fix out, then we can think of how to do this in a broader scope in #1731

Copy link
Member

@pichlermarc pichlermarc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall this looks good to me, thank you for taking care of this @trentm 🙂
For testing, if possible, I think I'd prefer the options 2 or 3 that you mentioned;

However, I'd also be okay to skip them for now to get the fix out and then we come up with a general solution in #1731

trentm added a commit to trentm/opentelemetry-js-contrib that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
…ests

Running scripts out-of-process for testing allows running tests with
different node options and with isolation. The former is useful for
ESM testing. This change includes adding an ESM test for ioredis.
This depends on open-telemetry#1694 to pass.

Closes: open-telemetry#1731
trentm added a commit to trentm/opentelemetry-js-contrib that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
@trentm
Copy link
Contributor Author

trentm commented Oct 13, 2023

However, I'd also be okay to skip them for now to get the fix out and then we come up with a general solution in #1731

Thanks for the review! Let's discuss on #1731 and #1735 -- my stab at a utility to do option 2.

@pichlermarc pichlermarc merged commit 7b457cd into open-telemetry:main Oct 17, 2023
11 checks passed
@dyladan dyladan mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2023
@trentm trentm deleted the trentm/issue1692-ioredis-esm branch October 17, 2023 14:08
bengl pushed a commit to nodejs/import-in-the-middle that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
The README example says the Hook callback `exported` arg is
"effectively `import * as exported from ${url}`".
https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module-namespace-objects specs that
a Module Namespace Object has a `@@toStringTag` property with value
"Module" and no constructor.

Fixes: #57
Obsoletes: #64

* * *

This behaviour changed with the changes in #43 when the
`register(...)`'d namespace changed from using an actual imported module
object to using a plain object with module properties copied over to it:

https://github.com/DataDog/import-in-the-middle/pull/43/files#diff-e69a24a4c3746fa1ee96a78e12bb12d2dd4eb6e4cacbced2bf1f4084952681d9L130-R208
I suspect that was an unintentional change.

The main question here is **whether you would like import-in-the-middle
to promise this**: that the `exported` namespace returned to the `Hook`
callback mimics this aspect of `import * as exported from '...'`.

As links to #57 show, this would help the OpenTelemetry JS project. I
[started](open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js-contrib#1694 (comment))
using `exported[Symbol.toStringTag]` in OpenTelemetry instrumentations a
while back as a way to handle differences in instrumentating a module
based on whether it was being used from ESM code vs CommonJS code. This
is convenient because **OpenTelemetry core instrumentation code uses the
same hook function for require-in-the-middle and import-in-the-middle
hooks**. It also seemed reasonable given the `Module Namespace Object`
spec entry. However, I grant that the `exported` arg need not be a
Module Namespace Object.

* * *

Assume you are willing to accept this, a note on my implementation:

I chose to explicitly add the `@@toStringTag` property because:
- it is more explicit
- the `for (const k of Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(primary)) { ... }`
alternative (proposed in #57 and #64) will only ever include the
`@@toStringTag`. Assuming my read of the
https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module-namespace-objects and
https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-module-namespace-exotic-objects sections is
correct, the module object will only ever have *string* keys (for the
"export"s), plus the one `@@toStringTag` property.
- the `@@toStringTag` property should not be enumerable (i.e.
`Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(exported,
Symbol.toStringTag).enumerable === false`). The other implementation
does not persist that descriptor value.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working pkg:instrumentation-ioredis priority:p1 Bugs which cause problems in end-user applications such as crashes, data inconsistencies
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ioredis: cannot instrument an ESM-imported ioredis
5 participants