Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more attributes for Cassandra to database semantic conventions #1217
Add more attributes for Cassandra to database semantic conventions #1217
Changes from 6 commits
0cf131a
9edabb4
a9842c1
3354514
8e3ba0d
2ec296f
608e40a
e8e7013
ee77c46
3eedef1
2d5db14
2fc1dfd
71e84a9
2bef33f
0dd6b01
a7d4db2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could consider using
db.sql.table
instead which has the same meaning and a more elaborate definition. CQL is close to SQL after all.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think having a separate attribute here for cassandra is fine. Otherwise we might want to rename
db.sql.table
todb.table
after all and describe to which technologies it applies. But I think I prefer the separate attribute a bit.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 I agree that should either be separate or use a top level db attribute
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
db.sql.table
is already mentioned in the rendered table. Having both is confusing:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There isn't much more to say @SergeyKanzhelev unless you have a new suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bumping, will get to this eventually
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Oberon00, I just had a closer look. It seems it already is a different convention group that extends the generic db.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, then it should be possible to just edit the magic HTML comments in the markdown to generate that in a separate table.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I think we have to remove it from the
db.tech
group below, then we can put it in a separate table.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Oberon00 it's been split
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Who can determine whether a query is idempotent? This does not sound like Cassandra specific.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Every query is marked as idempotent or not. https://docs.datastax.com/en/devapp/doc/devapp/driversQueryIdempotence.html