Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The website field (available on the openfoodfacts.org) is missing #3207

Closed
M123-dev opened this issue Oct 24, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #3376
Closed

The website field (available on the openfoodfacts.org) is missing #3207

M123-dev opened this issue Oct 24, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #3376
Assignees
Labels
✏️ Editing Many products are incomplete and don't have Nutri-Score, Eco-Score…so editing is important for users ✨ enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@M123-dev
Copy link
Member

M123-dev commented Oct 24, 2022

What

  • The website field (available on the openfoodfacts.org) is missing

Part of

@teolemon teolemon added the ✏️ Editing Many products are incomplete and don't have Nutri-Score, Eco-Score…so editing is important for users label Oct 25, 2022
@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Oct 25, 2022

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor

@teolemon Now that the "website" field is available from off-dart, where should we put it in Smoothie? Basic details?

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Nov 6, 2022

No, probably a dedicated section, this is not one of the most important fields.

@teolemon teolemon added the ✨ enhancement New feature or request label Nov 11, 2022
@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor

@teolemon Like that?
Capture d’écran 2022-11-27 à 15 37 34

@M123-dev
Copy link
Member Author

If we show it we should also allow to edit it, on the basic details page?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✏️ Editing Many products are incomplete and don't have Nutri-Score, Eco-Score…so editing is important for users ✨ enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants