Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"Example 3. Feature collection metadata response document" not consistent with /req/core/fc-md-links : item vs about #62

Closed
rouault opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

"Example 3. Feature collection metadata response document" not consistent with /req/core/fc-md-links : item vs about #62

rouault opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@cportele
Labels
Part 1: Core Issue related to Part 1 - Core progress: pull request available
Milestone
Part 1, First Dra...

Comments

@rouault
Copy link
Contributor

rouault commented Mar 5, 2018

Requirement 9 /req/core/fc-md-links mentions that the link array "SHALL include an item for each supported encoding with a link to the collection resource (relation: item)." but example 3 seems to use "rel": "about" for that purpose.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/opengeospatial/WFS_FES/master/core/openapi/schemas/collectionInfo.yaml does use rel: item in the example.
@cportele cportele self-assigned this Mar 8, 2018
@cportele cportele added this to the Part 1, First Draft Release milestone Mar 8, 2018
@cportele cportele added the Part 1: Core Issue related to Part 1 - Core label Mar 8, 2018
@cportele
Copy link
Member

cportele commented Mar 8, 2018

Thanks, it should be "item". This is already included in PR #70.

@cportele cportele mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2018
Merged
cportele added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2018
@cportele
Merge pull request #70 from opengeospatial/wfs3hackathon
e4146e7 
WFS 3.0 Hackathon (issues #59, #61, #62, #63, #64, #69, #72, #77, #78)
@cportele
Copy link
Member

resolved as part of pull request #70

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cportele cportele

Labels
Part 1: Core Issue related to Part 1 - Core progress: pull request available
Projects
Features Part 1: Core
Status: Done
Milestone
Part 1, First Draft Release
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rouault @cportele