Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mqtt.homeassistant] handle multiple availability topics #15977

Merged

Conversation

ccutrer
Copy link
Contributor

@ccutrer ccutrer commented Nov 29, 2023

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Cody Cutrer <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@antroids antroids left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM,
Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@lolodomo lolodomo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just 2 ultra minor comments

Signed-off-by: Cody Cutrer <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@lolodomo lolodomo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lolodomo lolodomo merged commit d6b19fe into openhab:main Dec 7, 2023
3 checks passed
@lolodomo lolodomo added the enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on label Dec 7, 2023
@lolodomo lolodomo added this to the 4.1 milestone Dec 7, 2023
@ccutrer ccutrer deleted the mqtt-homeassistant-multiple-availabilities branch December 7, 2023 19:26
austvik pushed a commit to austvik/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
* [mqtt.homeassistant] handle multiple availability topics

---------

Signed-off-by: Cody Cutrer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jørgen Austvik <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants