-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 473
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8341670: [Text,TextFlow] Public API for Text Layout Info #1596
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
8341670: [Text,TextFlow] Public API for Text Layout Info #1596
Conversation
👋 Welcome back angorya! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated. |
@andy-goryachev-oracle |
@andy-goryachev-oracle has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request. @andy-goryachev-oracle please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8341670 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved. |
Webrevs
|
* | ||
* @since 24 | ||
*/ | ||
public interface LayoutInfo { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why an interface ? It is easier to evolve a class when you want to add more info.
Also it should be sealed unless you can show why it is important that
applications can create instances.
It is being exposed for the benefit of RT but the class doc itself doesn't say when you might want to get one and why.
It might also benefit from a succinct description of what "the text layout" means and encompasses.
Oh and how do you know when it is no longer valid ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good points, thanks! please let me know if the update addressed your concerns.
a couple of notes:
- converted to an abstract class. I feel weird referring to an internal implementation at the API level (
public sealed abstract class LayoutInfo permits com.sun.javafx.text.PrismLayoutInfo
, yikes!) - why we get it: we don't explain why we need HitInfo or caret shapes or range shapes, do we?
/** | ||
* Represents an immutable snapshot of certain aspects of the text layout | ||
* in a {@code Text} or {@code TextFlow} node, | ||
* such as break up of the text into lines and the their bounds. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"the their"
* such as break up of the text into lines and the their bounds. | ||
* <p> | ||
* The snapshot is valid until the layout changes due to any change that | ||
* triggers that, such as resizing of the container or modification of properties. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"until the layout changes due to any change that triggers that"
it's not wrong, but writing change twice reads a bit off.
How about
The layout snapshot is no longer valid after actions such as resizing of the container, or modification of certain properties.
For example updating the text or the font would invalidate the layout snapshot, but a change of color would not.
I still don't see how applications can KNOW this has happened.
There's nothing on the (immutable) layout which says its invalidated.
There's no property to monitor.
So people will in effect never be able to do anything but use it and toss it and get a new one every time.
Perhaps you can make it 'cheap' to do this.
Since it is immutable, the Text or TextFlow can cache it.
If it is invalidated, the Text or TextFlow should know and can flush its cached version.
So the SAME immutable instance can be returned over and over again until that happens.
People can then also use "==" or equals() to check this and save themselves validation too.
I notice you don't have equals() so probably that is needed anyway to save people from manual comparison .. also an evolution issue if the class is updated.
A consequence of that is then the text about invalidation can be updated with advice on doing a simple equals() call if they need to know if it changed. And equals will start with "==" so will be really fast to return true ..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you!
I am struggling with how to explain that it should neither be cached, nor compared to another snapshot.
Maybe an example would help. Use case is an editable rich text component based on TextFlow
. The user presses HOME
and the caret needs to go to the beginning of the line. We get the LayoutInfo
, determine which line the caret is currently at and determine the start offset of that line to move the caret to.
Another example: in Text
, to determine whether the mouse is clicked inside of the text or beyond the last character (see JDK-8091012 ).
We are not expecting the application to monitor the text layout, so no notifications or observable properties or equals() are needed.
(I've added some words to that effect in Text/TextFlow.getLayoutInfo()
)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clients will usually obtain a LayoutInfo in order to respond to some user action or an update of the target node.
LayoutInfo should be considered an ephemeral snapshot, to be used and immediately discarded.
Clients should always obtain a new one when they need to respond again as likely the trigger to respond again means the target node has changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although I don't see the harm in being more efficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hear a suggestion to create a think wrapper/proxy instead of the snapshot, right?
This might, in fact, be a better idea. The API stays the same.
Let me think.
Thanks!
@Jugen do you think this PR addresses the issue https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8091012 ? |
One additional thought/question: There is a need to extract a few more data points from the text layout in addition to the text lines, specifically:
We currently have There is no corresponding Granted, one can attempt to analyze the So the question are:
|
@andy-goryachev-oracle First off thanks for all your work on the richtext control you're working on.
Unfortunately I don't think this helps for the hit problem Tomas was having, see However I was able to use all the methods in the |
Wrt to rangeShape & underlineShape: RichTextFX quite successfully uses the PathElement[] returned to it's advantage and so wouldn't gain from Rectangles.
|
thank you so much @Jugen for checking and the feedback! I see that a lot of what is being done in TextFlowExt should become unnecessary with the new API (or maybe even the whole thing might become unnecessary). Also, while the new API do not address JDK-8091012 directly, that is, there is no field added to Anyway, thank you. I agree with you that we should add T/TF.strikeThroughShape() for consistency sake. |
Thank you you all @prrace @Jugen @kevinrushforth for the feedback! |
/issue add JDK-8341672 |
@andy-goryachev-oracle |
/issue add JDK-8341671 |
@andy-goryachev-oracle |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I took a quick initial pass of the API. It looks like what I would expect. I left a couple questions inline. Also, you might want to document whether the newly added methods can return null (maybe in the LayoutInfo class docs, if none of them can return null).
* | ||
* @since 24 | ||
*/ | ||
public sealed abstract class CaretInfo permits PrismCaretInfo { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given the API you define, is there a reason not to make this an interface?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Originally it was an interface. Then @prrace said "Why an interface ? It is easier to evolve a class when you want to add more info."
Since this thing is sealed, it probably does not matter, and access to class methods is two nanoseconds faster (not that's important).
The only good thing about interface is the ease of mocking in testing, but we don't do that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had forgotten about that (and it doesn't matter, as you say). Carry on.
* | ||
* @since 24 | ||
*/ | ||
public sealed abstract class LayoutInfo permits com.sun.javafx.text.PrismLayoutInfo { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason to not make this an interface?
* | ||
* @return the list of {@code TextLineInfo} objects | ||
*/ | ||
public abstract List<TextLineInfo> getTextLines(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the list immutable? If so (which I think it should be), can you specify that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A new instance gets created for each caller, we don't care what they do to it. Maybe we should say that?
From the API purity perspective, it could be, but an immutable list would incur a copy overhead, do we really need that?
It also looks like there is no easy way of creating an immutable wrapper similar to JDK's List12, so we'd need to invent one.
(Note: the original design called for an array, but List was recommended because of stream/etc)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can use Collections.unmodifiableList(List)
to wrap the list without copying.
public abstract TextLineInfo getTextLine(int index); | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Returns the geometry of the text selection, as an array of {@code Rectangle2D} objects, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"as an array ..." --> "as a list ...".
Is the list immutable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Finished the first pass through the API, with a few more questions.
* @param index the line index | ||
* @return the array of [x, ymin, ymax] values | ||
*/ | ||
public abstract double[] getLineAt(int index); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you considered returning a record for this?
If you did that, it might be easier for apps to consume. It would also make it easy for you to add a convenient List<CaretInfo.Line> getLines()
method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well, we could have returned Line2D but we have no such public class!
We have javafx.geometry.Rectangle2D but no corresponding Line2D.
I could use Rectangle2D here, which might also take care of the vertical text support which will have been added
in the year 252525.
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Returns the number of lines representing the caret. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this is in the text class, the term "lines" is ambiguous. You mean geometric lines, not text lines, right?
/** | ||
* Returns the number of lines representing the caret. | ||
* | ||
* @return the number of parts representing the caret |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't mix the terms "lines" and "parts". Pick one of them and use that.
* The geometry is encoded in an array of [x, ymin, ymax] values which | ||
* represent a line drawn from (x, ymin) to (x, ymax). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems overly restrictive, unless I don't understand what this does. How would this work for caret that is "caret" shaped -- ^
-- or shaped line an "I" with serifs? Presuming that specifying it with a series of geometric lines is sufficient, should it be defined as [xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax]
instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are talking about "geometry", assuming two things:
- the caret "geometry" represents a boundary between two characters and therefore is a line (or two lines in the case of a split caret)
- the text is horizontal
the latter poses a problem - on one hand, FX currently provides no support whatsoever for the vertical text, but that might change in the (distant) future. So perhaps Rectangle2D should work with the width of 0.
* <li>{@code minX} is always zero | ||
* <li>{@code minY} is the ascent of the first line (negative) | ||
* <li>{@code width} the width of the widest line | ||
* <li>{@code height} the sum of all lines height |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this correct ? What about spacing between lines, or is that included in the line height of each line?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is an existing related issues
JDK-8317120 RFE: TextFlow.rangeShape() ignores lineSpacing
JDK-8317122 RFE: TextFlow.preferredHeight ignores lineSpacing
so perhaps we need to add a boolean
argument to qualify whether the return value should include the last line's lineSpacing
or not.
public abstract List<Rectangle2D> selectionShape(int start, int end); | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Returns the geometry of the strike-through shape, as an array of {@code Rectangle2D} objects, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment here (and below) as above: this is a list not an array; it should ideally be immutable.
Please refer to
https://github.com/andy-goryachev-oracle/Test/blob/main/doc/Text/LayoutInfo.md
The RichTextArea control (JDK-8301121), or any custom control that needs non-trivial navigation within complex or wrapped text needs a public API to get information about text layout.
This change fixes the missing functionality by adding a new public method to the
Text
andTextFlow
classes.:The
LayoutInfo
provides a view into the text layout withinText
/TextFlow
nodes such as:This PR also adds the missing
strikeThroughShape()
method to complement existingunderlineShape()
andrangeShape()
for consistency sake:WARNING
Presently, information obtained via certain Text/TextField methods is incorrect with non-zero padding and borders, see JDK-8341438.
It is not clear whether this PR should correct the computation at least for the new APIs and keep the existing APIs as is to be fixed later, or if the fix should be applied to both sets of APIs at the same time.
Testing
The new APIs can be visually tested using the Monkey Tester on this branch:
https://github.com/andy-goryachev-oracle/MonkeyTest/tree/text.layout.api
in the Text and TextFlow pages:
See Also
FXMisc/RichTextFX#1246
/reviewers 2
/csr
Progress
Issues
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1596/head:pull/1596
$ git checkout pull/1596
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1596
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1596/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1596
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1596
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1596.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment