-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: SSMSE: An R package for Management Strategy Evaluation with Stock Synthesis Operating Models #4536
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@k-doering-NOAA thanks for this submission. I am a JOSS AEiC and here to help process initial steps.
Looks like it should have 4 zeros at the start, not 5: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0396-7044 |
@k-doering-NOAA I have just added the |
@KristinaRiemer do you think you could edit this one once you are available? |
👋 @k-doering-NOAA - note that your paper does not compile. As @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman says, you at least need to remove the extra 0 in an ORCID. In addition, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command |
Thank you @danielskatz and others - I will make changes to the ORCID, check the DOIs, and figure out why the paper isn't compiling within the next few days! |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman and @danielskatz, I fixed most of the DOIs and the paper now compiles with removing 1 0 from the ORCID. I still am not able to resolve the invalid DOI, I think it has something to do with the |
Potential reviewers: Ecosantos hvoltbb EDiLD |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman my current submissions are going a bit slowly, but I can definitely edit this submission once one of those are done! |
@danielskatz and @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, just wondering if either of you had a suggestion of what to do about the one DOI I cannot figure out how to make valid? (see previous post in thread) |
Maybe you could try encoding the offending part... doing that gives 10.1577/1548-8446%282006%2931%5B590%3ATCFIE%5D2.0.CO%3B2 |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot check references |
Assigned! @sbenthall is now the editor |
@Ecosantos Would you be able to review this submission? |
@sbenthall, Thanks for the invitation but, I am not really sure if I can review this submission. Fishery stock assessment has some particular nuances out of my expertise. I am happy to review anything related to population assessment of non-fishery stocks in the future. |
@HVoltBb Would you be able to review this submission to JOSS? |
@Edild Would you please be able to review this submission to JOSS? |
I am on vacation the next 3 weeks and cannot make it. |
@tkchafin Would you be able to review this submission? |
@jsta would you be able to review this submission? |
Sorry, I can't review this one. |
I can't review either. |
@r-barnes Would you please be able to review this submission? |
@molgor Would you please be able to review this submission? |
@tretherington Would you be able to review this submission? |
@pboesu Would you be able to review this submission? |
@sbenthall Unfortunately I am tied up with editorial duties elsewhere. Sorry! |
@sbenthall sorry, I'm too busy right now to commit |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
I can't add that reviewer: seananderson is not a username |
@editorialbot add @seananderson as reviewer |
@seananderson added to the reviewers list! |
Thanks @seananderson for agreeing to be a reviewer! |
Thank you @seananderson! |
@editorialbot add @quang-huynh as reviewer |
@quang-huynh added to the reviewers list! |
Thank you @quang-huynh for agreeing to be a reviewer! We have enough reviewers so now we can begin the review process. |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #4937. |
Submitting author: @k-doering-NOAA (Kathryn Doering)
Repository: https://github.com/nmfs-fish-tools/ssmse
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.2.6
Editor: @sbenthall
Reviewers: @seananderson, @quang-huynh
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @k-doering-NOAA. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@k-doering-NOAA if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: