Segment Replication - Fix NoSuchFileException errors caused when computing metadata snapshot on primary shards. #4422
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…uting metadata snapshot on primary shards. (opensearch-project#4366) * Segment Replication - Fix NoSuchFileException errors caused when computing metadata snapshot on primary shards. This change fixes the errors that occur when computing metadata snapshots on primary shards from the latest in-memory SegmentInfos. The error occurs when a segments_N file that is referenced by the in-memory infos is deleted as part of a concurrent commit. The segments themselves are incref'd by IndexWriter.incRefDeleter but the commit file (Segments_N) is not. This change resolves this by ignoring the segments_N file when computing metadata for CopyState and only sending incref'd segment files to replicas. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Fix spotless. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Update StoreTests.testCleanupAndPreserveLatestCommitPoint to assert additional segments are deleted. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Rename snapshot to metadataMap in CheckpointInfoResponse. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Refactor segmentReplicationDiff method to compute off two maps instead of MetadataSnapshots. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Fix spotless. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Revert catchall in SegmentReplicationSourceService. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Revert log lvl change. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Fix SegmentReplicationTargetTests Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> * Cleanup unused logger. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Suraj Singh <[email protected]>
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
|
Last run failed with below flaky test failure. Refiring! |
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #4422 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 70.54% 70.55%
- Complexity 56942 57101 +159
==========================================
Files 4572 4584 +12
Lines 273816 274453 +637
Branches 40152 40220 +68
==========================================
+ Hits 193170 193629 +459
- Misses 64455 64595 +140
- Partials 16191 16229 +38
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
Poojita-Raj
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2022
| @@ -483,10 +525,12 @@ private void waitForReplicaUpdate() throws Exception { | |||
| final List<ShardSegments> replicaShardSegments = segmentListMap.get(false); | |||
| // if we don't have any segments yet, proceed. | |||
| final ShardSegments primaryShardSegments = primaryShardSegmentsList.stream().findFirst().get(); | |||
| logger.debug("Primary Segments: {}", primaryShardSegments.getSegments()); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did you mean to leave this in?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I think this can remain.
| if (primaryShardSegments.getSegments().isEmpty() == false) { | ||
| final Map<String, Segment> latestPrimarySegments = getLatestSegments(primaryShardSegments); | ||
| final Long latestPrimaryGen = latestPrimarySegments.values().stream().findFirst().map(Segment::getGeneration).get(); | ||
| for (ShardSegments shardSegments : replicaShardSegments) { | ||
| logger.debug("Replica {} Segments: {}", shardSegments.getShardRouting(), shardSegments.getSegments()); |
| @@ -334,6 +336,51 @@ public MetadataSnapshot getMetadata(SegmentInfos segmentInfos) throws IOExceptio | |||
| return new MetadataSnapshot(segmentInfos, directory, logger); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| /** | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit - could add in a line explaining why we're leaving out the segments_n files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @Poojita-Raj for the comment. This change is needed to fix the file not found exception.
PR against main #4366 contains more details around the issue and fix.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Manual backport of #4366 to 2.x