Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prevent message collection from being updated after message count has been received #2180

Conversation

peternied
Copy link
Member

@peternied peternied commented Oct 19, 2022

Description

Prevent message collection from being updated after message count has been received

Also added mechanism to detect if messages were missed so tests can be updated to appropriate counts

Issues Resolved

Saw a failure for PR #2167 which had no code impact, saw the test testSSLPlainText was failing, looks like it was exiting early because the test was only looking for a smaller number of messages.

Testing

Tested locally, CI should confirm things are working as expected. Also ran the bulk integration test workflow [1], 18 runs with no issues

[1] https://github.com/peternied/security/actions/runs/3291303445/jobs/5425278205

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing
  • New functionality has been documented
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

… been recieved

Also added mechanism to detect if messages were missed so tests can be
updated to appropriate counts

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ jobs:
run: ./gradlew clean build -Dbuild.snapshot=false -x test -x integrationTest

- name: Test
run: OPENDISTRO_SECURITY_TEST_OPENSSL_OPT=true ./gradlew test integrationTest -i
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This log is ~27mb which doesn't open in the browser, by disabling info log level it will be easier to look at only failing tests in the GitHub Action UX. Note; the full details can be downloaded by looking for artifacts on the test run

.collect(Collectors.joining("\n")))
.toString();

throw new RuntimeException(missedMessagesErrorMessage);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This failure should help identify any other tests with the same bug in them, waiting for a full test run before marking this ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Runtime exception new RuntimeException(missedMessagesErrorMessage); will be always catch be the below } catch (final Exception e) { but this is probably ok

@cwperks
Copy link
Member

cwperks commented Oct 19, 2022

Thank you @peternied! I had changed the number in this PR (https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/pull/2166/files#r997685463) because this test was failing.

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
@peternied
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed the following tests that these changes exposed issued with:

  • org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testExternalConfig
  • org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testInternalConfig
  • org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testSourceFilter
  • org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testSourceFilterMsearch

@peternied peternied marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2022 17:14
@peternied peternied requested a review from a team October 20, 2022 17:14
@peternied
Copy link
Member Author

Restarted the CI as there was a network adapter issue on the GHA runner that caused the failure.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2180 (ec03ff4) into main (b836040) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #2180   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     61.07%   61.08%           
- Complexity     3260     3262    +2     
=========================================
  Files           259      259           
  Lines         18327    18330    +3     
  Branches       3249     3249           
=========================================
+ Hits          11193    11196    +3     
  Misses         5539     5539           
  Partials       1595     1595           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...pensearch/security/auditlog/impl/AuditMessage.java 74.12% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@cwperks cwperks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @peternied, I like the addition of the missedMessages section here. It gives more context when running these tests.


TestAuditlogImpl.sb = new StringBuffer();
TestAuditlogImpl.messages = messages;
final CountDownLatch latch = resetAuditStorage(expectedCount, messages);

try {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on surrounding this all with one try block?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like a good nit, if I make any more changes I'll include this in with it - sounds fair?

Copy link
Member

@DarshitChanpura DarshitChanpura left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ty for this PR @peternied ! Added a couple comments.

assertThat(genderMsg.getRequestBody(), containsString("Gender"));
assertThat(genderMsg.getRequestBody(), not(containsString("Salary")));

Assert.assertTrue(validateMsgs(messages));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this replaced with Matcher's assertTrue?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than cleanup this single line; we should really rewrite or remove this statement. I've created [FEATURE] AuditMessage validation in tests should be more useful / removed #2188 for tracking.

);
});

Assert.assertTrue(validateMsgs(messages));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same as above

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like a nitpick, if we want to invest there are better kinds of improvements we can make see #2188

@DarshitChanpura DarshitChanpura merged commit ba9d82e into opensearch-project:main Oct 24, 2022
@peternied peternied deleted the fixlogsink-wrong-message-count branch October 24, 2022 17:35
stephen-crawford pushed a commit to stephen-crawford/security that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
… been received (opensearch-project#2180)

Also adds mechanism to detect if messages were missed so tests can be updated to appropriate counts.

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Crawford <[email protected]>
peternied added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
Windows build and test support for 1.3

- Use most recent format of CI workflows from main
- Backport #2206
- Supply workarounds for JDK8 incompatible APIs for Encoding / Pattern matching (Thanks @cwperks!)
- Backport only freeport logic from #1638
- Backport #1758
- All updates to TestAuditlogImpl.java from main
  - #2180
  - #1935 
  - #1920
  - #1914
  - #1829 
  - And Targeted test updates for ComplianceAuditlogTest and BasicAuditlogTest to keep up with TestAuditlogImpl.java updates

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Crawford <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Crawford <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Crawford <[email protected]>
@peternied peternied added the backport 2.x backport to 2.x branch label Jul 19, 2023
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-2180-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 ba9d82ef6a2c6da137c19fcaaddce6dabcf7160f
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-2180-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-2180-to-2.x.

@peternied
Copy link
Member Author

Seeing failures on backport into 2.x - #3032 (review) going to trigger backport

Tests with failures:
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testInternalConfig
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testComplianceEnable
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testUpdate
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.RestApiComplianceAuditlogTest.testRestApiNewUser
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testInternalConfig
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.RestApiComplianceAuditlogTest.testAutoInit
 - org.opensearch.security.multitenancy.test.TenancyMultitenancyEnabledTests.testMultitenancyDisabled_endToEndTest
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testUpdate
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.RestApiComplianceAuditlogTest.testAutoInit
 - org.opensearch.security.auditlog.compliance.ComplianceAuditlogTest.testComplianceEnable
 - ```

@peternied
Copy link
Member Author

Actually my day is looking booked up - @DarshitChanpura could you see able backporting this PR into the 2.x line since you were looking into #3021?

DarshitChanpura pushed a commit to DarshitChanpura/security that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
… been received (opensearch-project#2180)

Also adds mechanism to detect if messages were missed so tests can be updated to appropriate counts.

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ba9d82e)
DarshitChanpura pushed a commit to DarshitChanpura/security that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
… been received (opensearch-project#2180)

Also adds mechanism to detect if messages were missed so tests can be updated to appropriate counts.

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ba9d82e)
DarshitChanpura pushed a commit to DarshitChanpura/security that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
… been received (opensearch-project#2180)

Also adds mechanism to detect if messages were missed so tests can be updated to appropriate counts.

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ba9d82e)
DarshitChanpura added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
…ssage count has been received (#2180) (#3035)

* Prevent message collection from being updated after message count has been received (#2180)

Also adds mechanism to detect if messages were missed so tests can be updated to appropriate counts.

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ba9d82e)

* Fixes failing citest task

Signed-off-by: Darshit Chanpura <[email protected]>

* Fixes spotlessChecks

Signed-off-by: Darshit Chanpura <[email protected]>

* Fixes test assertions to reflect correct number

Signed-off-by: Darshit Chanpura <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Darshit Chanpura <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Craig Perkins <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x backport to 2.x branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants