Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WIP Add network flows export support to OpenShift #982

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

WIP Add network flows export support to OpenShift #982

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rcarrillocruz
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 16, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rcarrillocruz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 16, 2021
@rcarrillocruz
Copy link
Contributor Author

openshift/api#846

@rcarrillocruz
Copy link
Contributor Author

This needs:

ipfix support on the template
Validation of protocols passed as arguments (netflow/sflow/ipfix) and fill defaults for ports on the protocols if not provided.

@rcarrillocruz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ipfix added to template

@rcarrillocruz rcarrillocruz mentioned this pull request Feb 22, 2021
Merged
@rcarrillocruz rcarrillocruz force-pushed the add_network_flows_export_support branch from 0c3a916 to d2c0846 Compare March 5, 2021 10:37
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 5, 2021

@rcarrillocruz: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp d2c0846 link /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows d2c0846 link /test e2e-aws-ovn-windows
ci/prow/e2e-ovn-ipsec-step-registry d2c0846 link /test e2e-ovn-ipsec-step-registry
ci/prow/e2e-ovn-step-registry d2c0846 link /test e2e-ovn-step-registry
ci/prow/e2e-aws-sdn-multi d2c0846 link /test e2e-aws-sdn-multi
ci/prow/e2e-ovn-hybrid-step-registry d2c0846 link /test e2e-ovn-hybrid-step-registry
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn d2c0846 link /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn d2c0846 link /test e2e-vsphere-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@rcarrillocruz
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a backup PR by running the ovs-vsctl commands on br-int within CNO manifests in case OVN-K based PR #1021 does not land in time, as that depends on a OVN-K upstream PR to land.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aojea aojea Awaiting requested review from aojea

@danwinship danwinship Awaiting requested review from danwinship

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rcarrillocruz @openshift-ci-robot