Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-17848: fix: don't fail if devices already in vg #387

Merged

Conversation

jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor

@jeff-roche jeff-roche commented Aug 17, 2023

It was discovered as part of the 4.14 verification process that the available devices check was creating an error due to not properly skipping devices that were already part of the volume group. This error would lead to a degraded state of the lvmcluster when the first reconciliation loop was initiated.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jeff-roche: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17848, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jeff-roche: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17848, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

It was discovered as part of the 4.14 verification process that the available devices check was creating an error due to not properly skipping devices that were already part of the volume group. This error would lead to a degraded state of the lvmcluster when the first reconciliation loop was initiated.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jeff-roche: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17848, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@jakobmoellerdev jakobmoellerdev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jakobmoellerdev, jeff-roche

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2023

@jeff-roche: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f3b7531 into openshift:main Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jeff-roche: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17848: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17848 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

It was discovered as part of the 4.14 verification process that the available devices check was creating an error due to not properly skipping devices that were already part of the volume group. This error would lead to a degraded state of the lvmcluster when the first reconciliation loop was initiated.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.14

@jeff-roche jeff-roche deleted the deviceFilterSkipAlreadyInVG branch August 17, 2023 15:13
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeff-roche: #387 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.14":

Applying: fix: don't fail if devices already in vg
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/vgmanager/devices.go
M	pkg/vgmanager/devices_test.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/vgmanager/devices_test.go
Auto-merging pkg/vgmanager/devices.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/vgmanager/devices.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 fix: don't fail if devices already in vg
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.14

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeff-roche: new pull request created: #397

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants