Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: 46516: kubelet was sending negative allocatable values #14379

Merged

Conversation

derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

@derekwaynecarr derekwaynecarr commented May 26, 2017

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member Author

[test]

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member Author

[test]

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member Author

@liggitt -- ptal

@@ -574,6 +574,11 @@ func (kl *Kubelet) setNodeStatusMachineInfo(node *v1.Node) {
value.Sub(res)
}
node.Status.Allocatable[k] = value
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this line got duplicated

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented May 30, 2017

nit on duplicated line, LGTM otherwise

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 30, 2017

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test Waiting: Determining build queue position

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to c7f261c

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member Author

fixed nit

[merge][severity: blocker]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to c7f261c

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/1848/) (Base Commit: 1c38059)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 30, 2017

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_request_origin/847/) (Base Commit: 96f1865) (Extended Tests: blocker) (Image: devenv-rhel7_6289)

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 375c727 into openshift:master May 31, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants