Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add wiring for running bare kube-controller-manager #18100

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2018
Merged

add wiring for running bare kube-controller-manager #18100

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2018

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented Jan 12, 2018

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 12, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jan 12, 2018
smarterclayton
smarterclayton reviewed Jan 12, 2018
View reviewed changes
vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-controller-manager/app/options/options.go
@@ -135,6 +137,8 @@ func NewCMServer() *CMServer {

// AddFlags adds flags for a specific CMServer to the specified FlagSet
func (s *CMServer) AddFlags(fs *pflag.FlagSet, allControllers []string, disabledByDefaultControllers []string) {
fs.StringVar(&s.OpenShiftConfig, "openshift-config", s.OpenShiftConfig, "indicates that this process should be compatible with openshift start master")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to make this a hidden flag

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to make this a hidden flag

Ok.

@deads2k deads2k changed the title [POC] add wiring for running bare kube-controller-manager add wiring for running bare kube-controller-manager Jan 15, 2018
deads2k
deads2k commented Jan 15, 2018
View reviewed changes
vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-controller-manager/app/patch.go
return func() {}, nil
}

// TODO this gets removed when no longer take flags and no longer build a recycler template
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've re-organized a bit and added comments about how we can get rid of each of these patches.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 15, 2018

/assign mfojtik
/assign soltysh

I've updated this to be cleaner and have criteria for eliminating the patches we're carrying. I think its ready to push forward.

@deads2k deads2k mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2018
Closed
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Jan 16, 2018

David gave me some more details about this PR on irc.
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 16, 2018
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 16, 2018

/hold

I just want to make sure that @smarterclayton is ready to push on this approach. All the options are bad.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 16, 2018
@deads2k deads2k added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 16, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 16, 2018
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 16, 2018

This doesn't force us to use it, but does organize our patches to make it clear what we're doing

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 16, 2018
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 16, 2018

@soltysh I added another commit to wire up usage in openshift to avoid duplicate methods. Take another look?

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 16, 2018

/retest

1 similar comment
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 16, 2018

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 16, 2018
soltysh
soltysh approved these changes Jan 16, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Jan 16, 2018

/retest

@deads2k deads2k added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 16, 2018
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 16, 2018

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 363a5f4 into openshift:master Jan 17, 2018
@deads2k deads2k deleted the controller-19-flaggable branch January 24, 2018 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@smarterclayton smarterclayton smarterclayton left review comments

@soltysh soltysh soltysh approved these changes

@adelton adelton Awaiting requested review from adelton

@liggitt liggitt Awaiting requested review from liggitt

Assignees

@mfojtik mfojtik

@soltysh soltysh

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@deads2k @soltysh @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-merge-robot @smarterclayton @mfojtik