-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bump image builder #20256
bump image builder #20256
Conversation
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, liggitt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/test cross |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Travis rules are complaining about your commit name, but only you know whether you care |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Not anymore. I'll update the commit checker later. Rules are much simpler now that we don't pick for any repo but kube and we always update all deps. |
/test cross |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
A note, this had nothing to do with imagebuilder deps, which are deliberately chosen to match origin. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/refresh |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@deads2k looks like your commits are bad?
|
That didn't use to matter. I'll adjust the commit checker |
f23b654
to
609dff3
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@bparees can you look and see if the extended image ecosystem job has rotted? It passed, I changed a commit message (no code changes) and it now fails. |
/retest |
it hasn't rotted (it passed the last 2 nightly runs: https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_branch_origin_extended_image_ecosystem/) but there does appear to be a flake w/ some of the replica tests that occasionally hangs the job for the full 6 hours. The common factor in all of them is that they use an NFS pod for PV storage. I will say I don't think we were seeing those hangs before the rebase :) |
(we've also added logic, at least to the mongo one, to time them out sooner. Looks like your test job hadn't picked up that change though, which is unfortunate since i was hoping to get some more debug info out of things when we handle the timeout ourselves) |
Looks like levels of deps for imagebuilder don't want to match origin 3.10. I pinned everything, then added this.
As I recall, we only need this for pkg/build/builders which are logically a separate product/binary. We really should split those out to make this work easier, less conflicty, and less dangerous
/assign @smarterclayton @liggitt