-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-42940: Fix egress gateway pod cleanup for remote zone pods. #2316
base: release-4.17
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
re-labeling gateway pod. It uses different handlers for update and delete pod internally. Remove external.gateway from the dual-stack exclusion, as it is supported for ipv6. Signed-off-by: Nadia Pinaeva <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 4b9c42b)
For local zone pods, deleteLogicalPort cleans this up, but before IC this function was called for all non-host-network pods, hence this logic. After IC, deleteLogicalPort won't be called for all remote zone pods, so condition is not needed. Signed-off-by: Nadia Pinaeva <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 839842b)
@npinaeva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-42940, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira backport release-4.16,release-4.15,release-4.14 |
@npinaeva: The following backport issues have been created:
Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.16 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: npinaeva, trozet The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
/retest-required |
@npinaeva: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
Backport of ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#4744
d/s merge #2314