Bump torch and lightning to 2.4.0 versions

[kprokofi]

Summary

How to test

Checklist

• I have added unit tests to cover my changes.​
• I have added integration tests to cover my changes.​
• I have ran e2e tests and there is no issues.
• I have added the description of my changes into CHANGELOG in my target branch (e.g., CHANGELOG in develop).​
• I have updated the documentation in my target branch accordingly (e.g., documentation in develop).
• I have linked related issues.

License

• I submit my code changes under the same Apache License that covers the project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
• I have updated the license header for each file (see an example below).

# Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.11%. Comparing base (8e6f831) to head (e93642b).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3843      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    81.01%   81.11%   +0.09%     
===========================================
  Files          277      276       -1     
  Lines        27252    27147     -105     
===========================================
- Hits         22079    22021      -58     
+ Misses        5173     5126      -47     

Flag	Coverage Δ
py310	80.69% <ø> (-0.30%)	⬇️
py311	80.89% <ø> (+0.14%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kprokofi]

@harimkang , we have multilabel-classification tests failed randomly. I noticed that during my SSeg PR and this PR also fails randomly. Could you take a look?

[harimkang]

@harimkang , we have multilabel-classification tests failed randomly. I noticed that during my SSeg PR and this PR also fails randomly. Could you take a look?

I'll try to reproduce it and take a look.

[harimkang]

@kprokofi I think it's safe to target 2.3 for this, what do you think?

[harimkang]

@harimkang , we have multilabel-classification tests failed randomly. I noticed that during my SSeg PR and this PR also fails randomly. Could you take a look?

#3869 -> I expect this PR to resolve the issue. merged that PR first and then merge this PR.