-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Errata #4 doesn't mention non-destructive mitigation option #8682
Comments
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682
12 tasks
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682. Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]>
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
Apr 30, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682. Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]>
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
Apr 30, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682. Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]>
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
Apr 30, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682. Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]>
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
Apr 30, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682. Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]>
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
Apr 30, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682. Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]>
JMoVS
added a commit
to JMoVS/zol
that referenced
this issue
May 1, 2019
Errata openzfs#4 doesn’t mention a non-destructive way to clear it. This commits fixes openzfs#8682. Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]>
behlendorf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2019
Users of existing pools, especially pools with top-level encrypted datasets, could run into trouble trying to work around Errata #4. Clarify that removing encrypted snapshots and bookmarks is enough to clear the errata. Reviewed-by: George Melikov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]> Closes #8682 Closes #8683
allanjude
pushed a commit
to allanjude/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2019
Users of existing pools, especially pools with top-level encrypted datasets, could run into trouble trying to work around Errata openzfs#4. Clarify that removing encrypted snapshots and bookmarks is enough to clear the errata. Reviewed-by: George Melikov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#8682 Closes openzfs#8683
allanjude
pushed a commit
to allanjude/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2019
Users of existing pools, especially pools with top-level encrypted datasets, could run into trouble trying to work around Errata openzfs#4. Clarify that removing encrypted snapshots and bookmarks is enough to clear the errata. Reviewed-by: George Melikov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Justin Scholz <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#8682 Closes openzfs#8683
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
System information
Describe the problem you're observing
@behlendorf Recently clarified how Errata #4 is actually processed in this comment:
#8625 (comment)
from there:
If this fact was to be communicated more clearly, it could help people who have top-level encrypted datasets and who don't want to destroy their whole pools, as mentioned in this comment of mine:
#8308 (comment)
Describe how to reproduce the problem
Simply creating new snapshots and deleting old ones is sufficient to get rid of the warning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: