zfs-dkms rpm: simplify scriptlets, fix uninstall #13182
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Fixes openzfs#10463.
|
I notice that the CentOS 8 tests are failing in the attached buildbot output. Though I may have missed something in the logs (they are quite verbose), the failures I saw seemed to be filesystem–level, with many successes mixed in, so I think the failures are unrelated to my change. At least CentOS 7 and Fedora 35 are succeeding, which suggests the package is working at least somewhat. |
behlendorf
added
Component: Packaging
|
Thanks for looking at this! I'm all for improving the packaging and making this more reliable. Unfortunately, the CI doesn't do its testing using the dkms packages, instead if builds kmod packages for testing. So in order to get this merged, it's going to need to be manually tested at least on the latest CentOS 7.x, Rocky|AlmaLinux 8.x, and Fedora 35 (which you've done). Just to make sure there are no surprises with those older dkms versions. In principle this looks nice to me as long as it works everywhere we need it to! As for the CentOS 8 failure that's definitely unrelated and can be ignored. We've got a handful of spurious failures still in the test suite. |
tonyhutter
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2022
behlendorf
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2022
behlendorf
added
Status: Accepted
mcmilk
pushed a commit
to mcmilk/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
nicman23
pushed a commit
to nicman23/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
nicman23
pushed a commit
to nicman23/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonwindows/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
beren12
pushed a commit
to beren12/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
|
Is there any chance this can be merged into the 2.1 branch? I still encounter this problem on every 2.1.x release because the fix never reached that branch. |
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
to tonyhutter/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2023
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
13 tasks
|
@jeremyvisser thanks for the heads-up. I just put out a PR for the backport to the next release here: #14958 |
behlendorf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2023
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <[email protected]>
Closes #10463
Closes #13182
|
A postinst script is no longer generated during package build with this change which results in the kernel module not being built during installation: #15328 |
|
@JKDingwall No, that's incorrect. The actual root cause is this: |
This was referenced Oct 18, 2023
|
@jeremyvisser can you provide some references how the PR breaks things for zfs? Also don't be afraid to CC me - I don't bite :-P |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation and Context
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
Description
This change attempts to simplify life by:
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser [email protected]
Fixes #10463.
How Has This Been Tested?
I ad-hoc tested this on my Fedora 35 system with the following scenarios:
I used
dnf upgradeordnf downgradefor these tasks. I do not believe the ZFS Test Suite is applicable to RPM packaging, as it appears to test ZFS itself, whereas this change applies only to the surrounding package.Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by.