Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: consistently use *.sdk.operatorframework.io wherever we use domains #3527

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2020

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

Description of the change:
Use a consistent domain suffix for all SDK features (plugin names, annotations, etc.)

Motivation for the change:
Consistency and to align with a domain we actually own.

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

@joelanford
Copy link
Member Author

I think I found all of them. If anyone knows of others, let me know!

Copy link
Member

@asmacdo asmacdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Let's create the same project but with the Helm plugin:
```sh
$ mkdir nginx-operator
$ cd nginx-operator
$ operator-sdk init --plugins=helm.operator-sdk.io/v1 --domain=com --group=example --version=v1alpha1 --kind=Nginx
$ operator-sdk init --plugins=helm.sdk.operatorframework.io/v1 --domain=com --group=example --version=v1alpha1 --kind=Nginx
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideally we would direct users to use short names to get the latest non-default plugin:

Suggested change
$ operator-sdk init --plugins=helm.sdk.operatorframework.io/v1 --domain=com --group=example --version=v1alpha1 --kind=Nginx
$ operator-sdk init --plugins=helm --domain=com --group=example --version=v1alpha1 --kind=Nginx

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll fix this in a follow-up.

Copy link
Member

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 24, 2020
@joelanford joelanford merged commit faa4a56 into operator-framework:master Jul 24, 2020
@joelanford joelanford deleted the consistent-domain branch July 25, 2020 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants