Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move validate forced decision to decision service #457

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 5, 2022

Conversation

mnoman09
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Moves findValidatedForcedDecision method to decision service as validatedForcedDecision

Test plan

All unit test and FSC tests should pass.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 29, 2021

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1920

  • 25 of 29 (86.21%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.002%) to 90.735%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
core-api/src/main/java/com/optimizely/ab/config/DatafileProjectConfig.java 7 8 87.5%
core-api/src/main/java/com/optimizely/ab/bucketing/DecisionService.java 17 20 85.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1914: 0.002%
Covered Lines: 4867
Relevant Lines: 5364

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link

@dustin-sier dustin-sier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@jaeopt jaeopt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@The-inside-man The-inside-man left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@msohailhussain msohailhussain merged commit 7298cf5 into master Jan 5, 2022
@msohailhussain msohailhussain deleted the mnoman/ValidateForcedDecisionMove branch January 5, 2022 23:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants