Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Configurable Options for cl.exe calls. #4

Open
orcmid opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Use Configurable Options for cl.exe calls. #4

orcmid opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested task actions to be carried out

Comments

@orcmid
Copy link
Owner

orcmid commented Sep 23, 2021

The cl.exe calls will rely on @-includes for certain variability. These should be modifiable by users and in a .gitignore that keeps the expanded build-point ignored in the rayLab and raylib clones, but potentially backed up in a repo of the user' choosing.

This leads to some interesting cases on nfoTools, where raylib might appear in the Toolcraft.

Options should apply to includes, compiling, and linking. The options should be dependencies with regard to any Make usage.

My intention is that build should be for releases. I would like to not distinguish via Release/ and Debug/ but just a flat build. There needs to be a way to have Release/ and Debug/ for those who want to mirror the Visual Studio practice.

I think using CMake, a build generator, is too much for a basic drop-in. It should not be prevented. It is just a bridge too far for starters and simple work. Yet scaling to it should be possible/straight-forward. Also, my focus on building on Windows for Windows means that porting farther is maybe not an option. So then there is consideration of build options with respect to raylib dependencies.

@orcmid orcmid added question Further information is requested task actions to be carried out labels Sep 23, 2021
@orcmid orcmid self-assigned this Sep 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested task actions to be carried out
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant