Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs(readme): switch chronological and topological #99

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2022
Merged

docs(readme): switch chronological and topological #99

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2022

Conversation

7596ff
Copy link
Contributor

@7596ff 7596ff commented Jul 1, 2022

Description

Is this backwards?

Motivation and Context

I thought the sort orders were backwards.

How Has This Been Tested?

It's a readme.

Screenshots / Output (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (no code change)
  • Refactor (refactoring production code)
  • Other

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@7596ff 7596ff requested a review from orhun as a code owner July 1, 2022 20:20
orhun
orhun approved these changes Jul 4, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner

@orhun orhun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, good catch!

@orhun orhun changed the title switch chronological and topological in README docs(readme): switch chronological and topological Jul 4, 2022
@orhun orhun merged commit 2289199 into orhun:main Jul 4, 2022
@7596ff 7596ff deleted the patch-1 branch July 7, 2022 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@orhun orhun orhun approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@7596ff @orhun