Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport #3759 to Release 2.10 branch. #4341

Merged

Conversation

pnorbert
Copy link
Contributor

(cherry-picked from master branch #4340)

Organize the processes into groups so that the two steps of metadata aggregation has more or less the same number or participants. This replaces in-node aggregation in first step. The new strategy balances the size of metadata gathered in the two steps.

…aster branch ornladios#4340)

Organize the processes into groups so that the two steps of metadata aggregation has more or less the same number or participants. This replaces in-node aggregation in first step. The new strategy balances the size of metadata gathered in the two steps.
@pnorbert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eisenhauer @vicentebolea Any idea why the macos configuration fails for the release_210 branch? This is the second run. Complaining about gnu 11 when using clang.

@eisenhauer
Copy link
Member

If I were guessing, I'd say that the runner images have changed, master CI has been updated to fix it and release_210 hasn't. Would need to look for the PR that fixed it, probably merged to master but not backported.

@eisenhauer
Copy link
Member

I haven't sorted out the PR that changed it yet, but we no longer build on macos-11 or -12 in master. I'm going to bypass branch protections to go ahead and merge this PR, but if we're going to keep updating release_210, we need to sort the CI.

@eisenhauer eisenhauer merged commit 5283b27 into ornladios:release_210 Sep 11, 2024
36 of 39 checks passed
@pnorbert pnorbert deleted the backport_PR3750_to_release_210 branch September 16, 2024 17:36
@vicentebolea vicentebolea mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants