Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Openscap compliance facts (HMS-2836) #4349

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

croissanne
Copy link
Member

Also adds the policy id to the blueprint, this doesn't have any effect
on the openscap step, it just puts in place the rhsm fact so instances
registered to insights will appear under that policy.


@croissanne croissanne changed the title Openscap compliance facts Openscap compliance facts (HMS-2836) Sep 5, 2024
@@ -975,6 +975,12 @@ components:
required:
- profile_id
properties:
policy_id:
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm unsure if this belongs here, could add a separate 'Compliance' customisation.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah this is a fair point. I don't have strong feelings though

@croissanne croissanne requested review from kingsleyzissou and removed request for kingsleyzissou September 5, 2024 13:21
Also adds the policy id to the blueprint, this doesn't have any effect
on the openscap step, it just puts in place the rhsm fact so instances
registered to insights will appear under that policy.
@croissanne croissanne enabled auto-merge (rebase) September 6, 2024 09:04
@croissanne croissanne merged commit a6b87b5 into osbuild:main Sep 6, 2024
47 of 50 checks passed
@croissanne croissanne deleted the openscap-compliance-facts branch September 6, 2024 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants