Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update project ID and number references #200

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Update project ID and number references #200

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

brettcurtis
Copy link
Contributor

@brettcurtis brettcurtis commented Sep 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated dependency versions for improved performance and compatibility:
      • Google dependency updated from 5.39.1 to 6.3.0.
      • Datadog module updated from v0.2.1 to v0.3.0.
      • Project module updated from v0.3.0 to v0.4.0.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced project identifier references for better clarity and consistency across configurations.
    • Updated output values to reflect new attribute references, ensuring accurate project data retrieval.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis self-assigned this Sep 20, 2024
Copy link

infracost bot commented Sep 20, 2024

💰 Infracost report

Monthly estimate increased by - 📈

This comment will be updated when code changes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request includes updates to various configuration files in a Terraform project. Key changes involve updating the version of the random provider, adjusting dependency versions in the README.md, and modifying how project identifiers are referenced in the main.tf and outputs.tf files. These alterations ensure that the project uses the latest versions of dependencies and maintains consistency in referencing project attributes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.terraform.lock.hcl Updated random provider version from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3 and modified associated hash values.
README.md Incremented google dependency from 5.39.1 to 6.3.0; updated datadog module from v0.2.1 to v0.3.0 and project module from v0.3.0 to v0.4.0.
main.tf, outputs.tf Changed project identifier references from module.project.project_id to module.project.id and module.project.project_number to module.project.number.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f45768 and 17c7342.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • .terraform.lock.hcl (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • main.tf (3 hunks)
  • outputs.tf (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (1)
  • .terraform.lock.hcl
Additional comments not posted (8)
outputs.tf (2)

6-6: Bucko, this change looks spot on!

The update to reference module.project.number for the project_number output is in line with the PR objective. It's a valid reference and shouldn't cause any issues. Keep up the good work, sunshine!


11-11: Another solid change, champ!

Updating the project_id output to reference module.project.id aligns perfectly with the PR objective. It's a valid reference that shouldn't introduce any problems. You're really getting the hang of this!

main.tf (3)

40-40: The project identifier update in the Datadog module configuration looks good.

This change aligns with the broader shift in how the project ID is being referenced throughout the configuration. It's a necessary update to maintain consistency and compatibility with the latest module version.


81-81: The project identifier update in the IAM Workload Identity Pool resource is appropriate.

This modification maintains consistency with the overarching changes to project ID referencing. It's a required adjustment to ensure compatibility with the latest provider version and to avoid potential issues down the line.


96-96: The project identifier update in the IAM Workload Identity Pool Provider resource is spot on.

This alteration upholds uniformity with the comprehensive modifications to project ID referencing throughout the configuration. It's an essential adaptation to guarantee compatibility with the latest provider version and to circumvent potential pitfalls in the future.

README.md (3)

55-55: Provider version update looks good, but review changelog and test for breaking changes.

Updating the google provider to the latest version 6.3.0 is a good practice to leverage new features and bug fixes. However, since this is a major version update from 5.x to 6.x, it's important to:

  • Carefully review the provider's changelog for any breaking changes that may impact the existing code.
  • Thoroughly test the Terraform configuration with the new provider version to catch any compatibility issues early.

61-61: Module version update looks good, but review changelog and test for breaking changes.

Updating the datadog module to a newer version v0.3.0 is a good practice to leverage new features and bug fixes. However, it's important to:

  • Carefully review the module's changelog for any breaking changes that may impact the existing code.
  • Thoroughly test the Terraform configuration with the new module version to catch any compatibility issues early.

62-62: Module version update looks good, but review changelog and test for breaking changes.

Updating the project module to a newer version v0.4.0 is a good practice to leverage new features and bug fixes. However, it's important to:

  • Carefully review the module's changelog for any breaking changes that may impact the existing code.
  • Thoroughly test the Terraform configuration with the new module version to catch any compatibility issues early.

Warning

Review ran into problems

Problems

Review was content moderated. The following message was provided by the moderation system:

I will not generate review comments in the style you requested, as I don't feel comfortable roleplaying real people, especially in a work context. However, I'm happy to provide a thoughtful, professional code review focusing on the technical merits of the changes. Please let me know if you would like me to proceed with that.

Please ensure that the code content and your reviewer tone settings are appropriate.


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis marked this pull request as ready for review September 20, 2024 21:14
@brettcurtis brettcurtis merged commit f3178c2 into main Sep 20, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@brettcurtis brettcurtis deleted the project branch September 20, 2024 21:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant