-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 497
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Add ephemeral-storage to cron worker #885
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use more :) 100/500 is fine as well
Integration tests success for feab9d192e32b29a49bf0f49e737a80c22d53d31 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is the https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/volumes/#emptydir that is causing ephemeralstorage to get filled up. I agree with @inferno-chromium we should probably go higher.
feab9d1
to
c074b61
Compare
Done. |
That makes more sense. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Integration tests success for c074b6119e074c7376afb0c4d6d58ab1e08a7acf |
Integration tests success for 78bdc9856db1d2f19e4ca2c02a365c3c4b69cc76 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Cron workers were getting evicted since no ephemeral storage was requested. Explicitly requesting ephemeral-storage to avoid this.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
No.