-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 663
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different ETag vs. OC-ETag handling in sync-client #3946
Comments
@RealRancor The client will always prefer the |
@ckamm Great, thanks for the info. So i think its save to remove the |
@RealRancor Thanks for the initiative. |
Ahhh, good point. Havn't thought about the Apps. |
@RealRancor The client also supports weak etags now. :) |
On iOS we are not using the "OC-Etag" we are just using the "ETag". PD: @guruz thanks for remember the mobile apps 😉 |
@RealRancor , in Android the preference for "OC-Etag" and the removal of "-gzip" suffix will be introduced with the next release - hopefully in the middle of November. It's part of owncloud/android#1109 |
@davivel Great, thanks for the info. @javiergonzper I think it makes sense. A lot of serves configs out there will strip the ETag away or modify it so the "normal" ETag is not always reliable. Thats why oC 8.1 has introduced this new OC-ETag header. So for know i keep the gzip off in the nginx config. |
Hi,
currently updating the nginx config for oC 8.1/8.2 in owncloud-archive/documentation#1320 and planned to remove the
gzip off;
statement in there as oC 8.1.x has introduced the OC-ETag header.My question is if the client able to handle a different ETag without any issues?
If
gzip off;
is used the server replies with the following response:where a
gzip on;
is showing:Note the difference between:
and
The requests above where done with:
curl -I -sH 'Accept-encoding: gzip' --user test:test https://example.com/remote.php/webdav/test.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: