Re-enable tests #43
Closed
Re-enable tests #43
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
dependency:go-offline doesn't run tests. Also we should probably put the test section in the test block. Probably need to just redo most of the circle.yml. Maven is really slow compared to SBT unless we are doing something horribly wrong (~50 min v.s. ~20 min for builds). |
pwoody
suggested changes
Oct 5, 2016
- use existing ./dev/run-tests for running tests - only publish from publish block for tags and master branch and not on every CI build
(that must be Apache licensed to past RAT checks)
|
For reference the amplab jenkins build takes about 2hr to run a verify build: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/lastSuccessfulBuild/ |
|
So this times out after the single command Timing of a full test run on my laptop:
|
|
I think the approach we should take for running tests in circle is to parallelize the Spark unit tests into separate circle containers and provide a list of modules (mesos, yarn, graphx, etc) that are run on each container. |
Closed
|
Replaced with #78 |
mccheah
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2019
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims at improving the way physical plans are explained in spark. Currently, the explain output for physical plan may look very cluttered and each operator's string representation can be very wide and wraps around in the display making it little hard to follow. This especially happens when explaining a query 1) Operating on wide tables 2) Has complex expressions etc. This PR attempts to split the output into two sections. In the header section, we display the basic operator tree with a number associated with each operator. In this section, we strictly control what we output for each operator. In the footer section, each operator is verbosely displayed. Based on the feedback from Maryann, the uncorrelated subqueries (SubqueryExecs) are not included in the main plan. They are printed separately after the main plan and can be correlated by the originating expression id from its parent plan. To illustrate, here is a simple plan displayed in old vs new way. Example query1 : ``` EXPLAIN SELECT key, Max(val) FROM explain_temp1 WHERE key > 0 GROUP BY key HAVING max(val) > 0 ``` Old : ``` *(2) Project [key#2, max(val)#15] +- *(2) Filter (isnotnull(max(val#3)#18) AND (max(val#3)#18 > 0)) +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[key#2], functions=[max(val#3)], output=[key#2, max(val)#15, max(val#3)#18]) +- Exchange hashpartitioning(key#2, 200) +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[key#2], functions=[partial_max(val#3)], output=[key#2, max#21]) +- *(1) Project [key#2, val#3] +- *(1) Filter (isnotnull(key#2) AND (key#2 > 0)) +- *(1) FileScan parquet default.explain_temp1[key#2,val#3] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(key#2), (key#2 > 0)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/user/hive/warehouse/explain_temp1], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(key), GreaterThan(key,0)], ReadSchema: struct<key:int,val:int> ``` New : ``` Project (8) +- Filter (7) +- HashAggregate (6) +- Exchange (5) +- HashAggregate (4) +- Project (3) +- Filter (2) +- Scan parquet default.explain_temp1 (1) (1) Scan parquet default.explain_temp1 [codegen id : 1] Output: [key#2, val#3] (2) Filter [codegen id : 1] Input : [key#2, val#3] Condition : (isnotnull(key#2) AND (key#2 > 0)) (3) Project [codegen id : 1] Output : [key#2, val#3] Input : [key#2, val#3] (4) HashAggregate [codegen id : 1] Input: [key#2, val#3] (5) Exchange Input: [key#2, max#11] (6) HashAggregate [codegen id : 2] Input: [key#2, max#11] (7) Filter [codegen id : 2] Input : [key#2, max(val)#5, max(val#3)#8] Condition : (isnotnull(max(val#3)#8) AND (max(val#3)#8 > 0)) (8) Project [codegen id : 2] Output : [key#2, max(val)#5] Input : [key#2, max(val)#5, max(val#3)#8] ``` Example Query2 (subquery): ``` SELECT * FROM explain_temp1 WHERE KEY = (SELECT Max(KEY) FROM explain_temp2 WHERE KEY = (SELECT Max(KEY) FROM explain_temp3 WHERE val > 0) AND val = 2) AND val > 3 ``` Old: ``` *(1) Project [key#2, val#3] +- *(1) Filter (((isnotnull(KEY#2) AND isnotnull(val#3)) AND (KEY#2 = Subquery scalar-subquery#39)) AND (val#3 > 3)) : +- Subquery scalar-subquery#39 : +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(KEY#26)], output=[max(KEY)#45]) : +- Exchange SinglePartition : +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(KEY#26)], output=[max#47]) : +- *(1) Project [key#26] : +- *(1) Filter (((isnotnull(KEY#26) AND isnotnull(val#27)) AND (KEY#26 = Subquery scalar-subquery#38)) AND (val#27 = 2)) : : +- Subquery scalar-subquery#38 : : +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(KEY#28)], output=[max(KEY)#43]) : : +- Exchange SinglePartition : : +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(KEY#28)], output=[max#49]) : : +- *(1) Project [key#28] : : +- *(1) Filter (isnotnull(val#29) AND (val#29 > 0)) : : +- *(1) FileScan parquet default.explain_temp3[key#28,val#29] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(val#29), (val#29 > 0)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/user/hive/warehouse/explain_temp3], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(val), GreaterThan(val,0)], ReadSchema: struct<key:int,val:int> : +- *(1) FileScan parquet default.explain_temp2[key#26,val#27] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(key#26), isnotnull(val#27), (val#27 = 2)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/user/hive/warehouse/explain_temp2], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(key), IsNotNull(val), EqualTo(val,2)], ReadSchema: struct<key:int,val:int> +- *(1) FileScan parquet default.explain_temp1[key#2,val#3] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(key#2), isnotnull(val#3), (val#3 > 3)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/user/hive/warehouse/explain_temp1], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(key), IsNotNull(val), GreaterThan(val,3)], ReadSchema: struct<key:int,val:int> ``` New: ``` Project (3) +- Filter (2) +- Scan parquet default.explain_temp1 (1) (1) Scan parquet default.explain_temp1 [codegen id : 1] Output: [key#2, val#3] (2) Filter [codegen id : 1] Input : [key#2, val#3] Condition : (((isnotnull(KEY#2) AND isnotnull(val#3)) AND (KEY#2 = Subquery scalar-subquery#23)) AND (val#3 > 3)) (3) Project [codegen id : 1] Output : [key#2, val#3] Input : [key#2, val#3] ===== Subqueries ===== Subquery:1 Hosting operator id = 2 Hosting Expression = Subquery scalar-subquery#23 HashAggregate (9) +- Exchange (8) +- HashAggregate (7) +- Project (6) +- Filter (5) +- Scan parquet default.explain_temp2 (4) (4) Scan parquet default.explain_temp2 [codegen id : 1] Output: [key#26, val#27] (5) Filter [codegen id : 1] Input : [key#26, val#27] Condition : (((isnotnull(KEY#26) AND isnotnull(val#27)) AND (KEY#26 = Subquery scalar-subquery#22)) AND (val#27 = 2)) (6) Project [codegen id : 1] Output : [key#26] Input : [key#26, val#27] (7) HashAggregate [codegen id : 1] Input: [key#26] (8) Exchange Input: [max#35] (9) HashAggregate [codegen id : 2] Input: [max#35] Subquery:2 Hosting operator id = 5 Hosting Expression = Subquery scalar-subquery#22 HashAggregate (15) +- Exchange (14) +- HashAggregate (13) +- Project (12) +- Filter (11) +- Scan parquet default.explain_temp3 (10) (10) Scan parquet default.explain_temp3 [codegen id : 1] Output: [key#28, val#29] (11) Filter [codegen id : 1] Input : [key#28, val#29] Condition : (isnotnull(val#29) AND (val#29 > 0)) (12) Project [codegen id : 1] Output : [key#28] Input : [key#28, val#29] (13) HashAggregate [codegen id : 1] Input: [key#28] (14) Exchange Input: [max#37] (15) HashAggregate [codegen id : 2] Input: [max#37] ``` Note: I opened this PR as a WIP to start getting feedback. I will be on vacation starting tomorrow would not be able to immediately incorporate the feedback. I will start to work on them as soon as i can. Also, currently this PR provides a basic infrastructure for explain enhancement. The details about individual operators will be implemented in follow-up prs ## How was this patch tested? Added a new test `explain.sql` that tests basic scenarios. Need to add more tests. Closes apache#24759 from dilipbiswal/explain_feature. Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
rahij
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2020
… more scenarios such as PartitioningCollection
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to improve `EnsureRquirement.reorderJoinKeys` to handle the following scenarios:
1. If the keys cannot be reordered to match the left-side `HashPartitioning`, consider the right-side `HashPartitioning`.
2. Handle `PartitioningCollection`, which may contain `HashPartitioning`
### Why are the changes needed?
1. For the scenario 1), the current behavior matches either the left-side `HashPartitioning` or the right-side `HashPartitioning`. This means that if both sides are `HashPartitioning`, it will try to match only the left side.
The following will not consider the right-side `HashPartitioning`:
```
val df1 = (0 until 10).map(i => (i % 5, i % 13)).toDF("i1", "j1")
val df2 = (0 until 10).map(i => (i % 7, i % 11)).toDF("i2", "j2")
df1.write.format("parquet").bucketBy(4, "i1", "j1").saveAsTable("t1")df2.write.format("parquet").bucketBy(4, "i2", "j2").saveAsTable("t2")
val t1 = spark.table("t1")
val t2 = spark.table("t2")
val join = t1.join(t2, t1("i1") === t2("j2") && t1("i1") === t2("i2"))
join.explain
== Physical Plan ==
*(5) SortMergeJoin [i1#26, i1#26], [j2#31, i2#30], Inner
:- *(2) Sort [i1#26 ASC NULLS FIRST, i1#26 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i1#26, i1#26, 4), true, [id=#69]
: +- *(1) Project [i1#26, j1#27]
: +- *(1) Filter isnotnull(i1#26)
: +- *(1) ColumnarToRow
: +- FileScan parquet default.t1[i1#26,j1#27] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(i1#26)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(i1)], ReadSchema: struct<i1:int,j1:int>, SelectedBucketsCount: 4 out of 4
+- *(4) Sort [j2#31 ASC NULLS FIRST, i2#30 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0.
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(j2#31, i2#30, 4), true, [id=#79]. <===== This can be removed
+- *(3) Project [i2#30, j2#31]
+- *(3) Filter (((j2#31 = i2#30) AND isnotnull(j2#31)) AND isnotnull(i2#30))
+- *(3) ColumnarToRow
+- FileScan parquet default.t2[i2#30,j2#31] Batched: true, DataFilters: [(j2#31 = i2#30), isnotnull(j2#31), isnotnull(i2#30)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(j2), IsNotNull(i2)], ReadSchema: struct<i2:int,j2:int>, SelectedBucketsCount: 4 out of 4
```
2. For the scenario 2), the current behavior does not handle `PartitioningCollection`:
```
val df1 = (0 until 100).map(i => (i % 5, i % 13)).toDF("i1", "j1")
val df2 = (0 until 100).map(i => (i % 7, i % 11)).toDF("i2", "j2")
val df3 = (0 until 100).map(i => (i % 5, i % 13)).toDF("i3", "j3")
val join = df1.join(df2, df1("i1") === df2("i2") && df1("j1") === df2("j2")) // PartitioningCollection
val join2 = join.join(df3, join("j1") === df3("j3") && join("i1") === df3("i3"))
join2.explain
== Physical Plan ==
*(9) SortMergeJoin [j1#8, i1#7], [j3#30, i3#29], Inner
:- *(6) Sort [j1#8 ASC NULLS FIRST, i1#7 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0. <===== This can be removed
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(j1#8, i1#7, 5), true, [id=#58] <===== This can be removed
: +- *(5) SortMergeJoin [i1#7, j1#8], [i2#18, j2#19], Inner
: :- *(2) Sort [i1#7 ASC NULLS FIRST, j1#8 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i1#7, j1#8, 5), true, [id=#45]
: : +- *(1) Project [_1#2 AS i1#7, _2#3 AS j1#8]
: : +- *(1) LocalTableScan [_1#2, _2#3]
: +- *(4) Sort [i2#18 ASC NULLS FIRST, j2#19 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i2#18, j2#19, 5), true, [id=#51]
: +- *(3) Project [_1#13 AS i2#18, _2#14 AS j2#19]
: +- *(3) LocalTableScan [_1#13, _2#14]
+- *(8) Sort [j3#30 ASC NULLS FIRST, i3#29 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(j3#30, i3#29, 5), true, [id=#64]
+- *(7) Project [_1#24 AS i3#29, _2#25 AS j3#30]
+- *(7) LocalTableScan [_1#24, _2#25]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now from the above examples, the shuffle/sort nodes pointed by `This can be removed` are now removed:
1. Senario 1):
```
== Physical Plan ==
*(4) SortMergeJoin [i1#26, i1#26], [i2#30, j2#31], Inner
:- *(2) Sort [i1#26 ASC NULLS FIRST, i1#26 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i1#26, i1#26, 4), true, [id=#67]
: +- *(1) Project [i1#26, j1#27]
: +- *(1) Filter isnotnull(i1#26)
: +- *(1) ColumnarToRow
: +- FileScan parquet default.t1[i1#26,j1#27] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(i1#26)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(i1)], ReadSchema: struct<i1:int,j1:int>, SelectedBucketsCount: 4 out of 4
+- *(3) Sort [i2#30 ASC NULLS FIRST, j2#31 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
+- *(3) Project [i2#30, j2#31]
+- *(3) Filter (((j2#31 = i2#30) AND isnotnull(j2#31)) AND isnotnull(i2#30))
+- *(3) ColumnarToRow
+- FileScan parquet default.t2[i2#30,j2#31] Batched: true, DataFilters: [(j2#31 = i2#30), isnotnull(j2#31), isnotnull(i2#30)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(j2), IsNotNull(i2)], ReadSchema: struct<i2:int,j2:int>, SelectedBucketsCount: 4 out of 4
```
2. Scenario 2):
```
== Physical Plan ==
*(8) SortMergeJoin [i1#7, j1#8], [i3#29, j3#30], Inner
:- *(5) SortMergeJoin [i1#7, j1#8], [i2#18, j2#19], Inner
: :- *(2) Sort [i1#7 ASC NULLS FIRST, j1#8 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i1#7, j1#8, 5), true, [id=#43]
: : +- *(1) Project [_1#2 AS i1#7, _2#3 AS j1#8]
: : +- *(1) LocalTableScan [_1#2, _2#3]
: +- *(4) Sort [i2#18 ASC NULLS FIRST, j2#19 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i2#18, j2#19, 5), true, [id=#49]
: +- *(3) Project [_1#13 AS i2#18, _2#14 AS j2#19]
: +- *(3) LocalTableScan [_1#13, _2#14]
+- *(7) Sort [i3#29 ASC NULLS FIRST, j3#30 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(i3#29, j3#30, 5), true, [id=#58]
+- *(6) Project [_1#24 AS i3#29, _2#25 AS j3#30]
+- *(6) LocalTableScan [_1#24, _2#25]
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes apache#29074 from imback82/reorder_keys.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.