fix(generics): support generic response types

[mharkins-cosm]

This is an attempt to address issue #204. Because the nested generic objects must be checked dynamically for names, I had to get rid of the NAME constant and replace it with a name() method. Then it's just including named type parameter names in the parent name surrounded by angle brackets (<>).

[tiagolobocastro]

@mharkins-cosm could you please rebase so we can run the tests with gha?
I think this would be a breaking change to the API, so we'd have to bump up the version and add this to the changelog.

[mharkins-cosm]

@mharkins-cosm could you please rebase so we can run the tests with gha? I think this would be a breaking change to the API, so we'd have to bump up the version and add this to the changelog.

Done

[tiagolobocastro]

@mharkins-cosm could you please rebase so we can run the tests with gha? I think this would be a breaking change to the API, so we'd have to bump up the version and add this to the changelog.

Done

Cool, it's running now. Could you please also add tests for generic response types and also update the changelog? Thanks

[mharkins-cosm]

@mharkins-cosm could you please rebase so we can run the tests with gha? I think this would be a breaking change to the API, so we'd have to bump up the version and add this to the changelog.

Done

Cool, it's running now. Could you please also add tests for generic response types and also update the changelog? Thanks

Yes, I will. I'm sorry I haven't had time to get to it yet. It's on my todo list!

[mharkins-cosm]

@tiagolobocastro Finally got to adding the requested test and changelog. Would you mind having a look and kicking of the checks if it looks good to you?

[mharkins-cosm]

saw the lint check failed. i think i should have that fixed now.

[tiagolobocastro]

could use filter_map here? also maybe into_iter instead of iter avoiding having to write the clone?

[mharkins-cosm]

hmmm... i get a warning for into_iter, but can use filter_map.

[mharkins-cosm]

✅

[tiagolobocastro]

saw the lint check failed. i think i should have that fixed now.

cool I kicked the GHA, will have a another look tomorrow

[mharkins-cosm]

Funny the clippy warning is not part of this PR, nor does it appear to be accurate. Do you want me to add an allow annotation anyway, to allow the check to pass?

[tiagolobocastro]

Funny the clippy warning is not part of this PR, nor does it appear to be accurate. Do you want me to add an allow annotation anyway, to allow the check to pass?

That'd be great if you don't mind 👍

[mharkins-cosm]

Thanks very much @tiagolobocastro ! Any idea when it'll be released, along with the actix 4 support?

[tiagolobocastro]

No, thank you! I'll probably try to publish it this weekend.