feat: function-like macro for generating tests #10233
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
klkvr
force-pushed
the
klkvr/generate-tests
branch
from
1581487
to
fa365a6
Compare
klkvr
force-pushed
the
klkvr/generate-tests
branch
from
fa365a6
to
af497eb
Compare
mattsse
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
add_arbitrary_testsdoesn't work great with generics which resulted in issues for some types in #10201this PR changes generated code to allow inferring default generics where possible and adds
generate_testsmacro which allows generating tests for specific types, making it possible to generate multiple test modules for the same struct with different genericsmacro invocation should look as following:
generate_tests!(#[rlp, compact] NewBlock<BlockType> TestModuleName)