Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update CODEOWNERS for new crate structure #8601

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

Rjected
Copy link
Member

@Rjected Rjected commented Jun 4, 2024

This updates CODEOWNERS for the current folder structure we have, removed some things that no longer exist, and tried to assign people to paths

If anyone wants on / off one of these folders, please comment!

I'm not sure who to put on fs-util, so I would like feedback on that

@Rjected Rjected added the A-meta Changes in the contributor workflow and planning label Jun 4, 2024
@Rjected Rjected requested a review from gakonst as a code owner June 4, 2024 19:14
CODEOWNERS Outdated
crates/stages-api/ @onbjerg @rkrasiuk @shekhirin
crates/static-file @joshieDo @shekhirin
crates/static-file/ @joshieDo @shekhirin
crates/static-file-types/ @joshieDo @shekhirin
crates/storage/ @rakita @joshieDo @shekhirin
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

think we need to unpack this folder at some point, it contains so much code by diff authors i think it makes sense to be granular

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any suggestions on owners for each subfolder?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the owner set will be roughly the same, but i think it makes sense to be granular still, esp when/if these are refactored, so i think

crates/storage/codecs              @joshieDo
crates/storage/db                      @joshieDo @rakita 
crates/storage/db-api               @joshieDo @rakita # think these were written primarily by joshie/dragan?
crates/storage/libmdbx-rs        @rakita # think dragan has primarily been maintaining this
crates/storage/nippy-jar           @joshieDo @shekhirin 
crates/storage/provider            @rakita @joshieDo @shekhirin 

storage-api/errors/db-common i have no idea

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no idea why formatting is so bad, they are aligned when editing the comment

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

copied this, tried to fill all the subfolders for storage

@Rjected Rjected force-pushed the dan/add-codeowners-new-structure branch from c5b4fe6 to 99441c3 Compare June 5, 2024 17:43
@Rjected Rjected added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 6, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 37f598a Jun 6, 2024
29 checks passed
@Rjected Rjected deleted the dan/add-codeowners-new-structure branch June 6, 2024 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Changes in the contributor workflow and planning
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants