Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: use execution-types instead of provider where possible #8971

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024
Merged

chore: use execution-types instead of provider where possible #8971

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

Rjected
Copy link
Member

@Rjected Rjected commented Jun 19, 2024

Just switches the imports, instead of going through the re-export now that we have this new crate. Made ExecutionOutcome not re-export from bundle_state.

@Rjected Rjected added the C-enhancement New feature or request label Jun 19, 2024
@mattsse mattsse added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e2b8254 Jun 19, 2024
32 checks passed
@mattsse mattsse deleted the dan/execution-types-cleanup branch June 19, 2024 22:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mattsse mattsse mattsse approved these changes

@rakita rakita Awaiting requested review from rakita rakita is a code owner

@joshieDo joshieDo Awaiting requested review from joshieDo joshieDo is a code owner

@shekhirin shekhirin Awaiting requested review from shekhirin shekhirin is a code owner

@onbjerg onbjerg Awaiting requested review from onbjerg onbjerg is a code owner

@rkrasiuk rkrasiuk Awaiting requested review from rkrasiuk rkrasiuk is a code owner

@fgimenez fgimenez Awaiting requested review from fgimenez fgimenez is a code owner

@gakonst gakonst Awaiting requested review from gakonst gakonst is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Rjected @mattsse