-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publish benchmarks app #9
Comments
Unfortunately, I can't publish that app as it is closed source. Do you know of a reasonably large open-source app that we could try benchmarking against? |
Probably not huge, but why not one from here https://github.com/gothinkster/realworld |
Happy to create a separate issue as well, but I'd also like to see comparisons against Rollup and some other bundlers! |
I'm interested in the source-map setting of the benchmark app(webpack and browserify). |
466: 2017-12-11 JS: Parcel、webpack 4.0.0α、Node.js Performance r=azu a=azu - [📦 Parcel](https://parceljs.org/ "📦 Parcel") - [🚀 Announcing Parcel: A blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler 📦](https://hackernoon.com/announcing-parcel-a-blazing-fast-zero-configuration-web-application-bundler-feac43aac0f1) - [🔌 Plugins](https://parceljs.org/plugins.html) - Benchmark issue - [Publish benchmarks app · Issue #9 · parcel-bundler/parcel](parcel-bundler/parcel#9) - [Feature request: source map support · Issue #68 · parcel-bundler/parcel](parcel-bundler/parcel#68) - [webpack 4.0.0-alpha.0 feedback · Issue #6064 · webpack/webpack](webpack/webpack#6064) - [Vote](https://webpack.js.org/vote/) - [Sean Thomas Larkin on Twitter: "Alright #JavaScript #webpack folks, I've created the voting item! If you _really_ want a Zero Configuration (aka your configs live in .pos… https://t.co/w5WE8T0I0J"](https://twitter.com/TheLarkInn/status/938928029044170752) - [Node.js Performance 改善ガイド - from scratch](http://yosuke-furukawa.hatenablog.com/entry/2017/12/05/125517)
@DeMoorJasper why was this issue closed? The pull request which referenced this issue swaps out the JSON parser used internally by parcel. It does not include any performance benchmarks or notes related to performance. |
There are various examples and blog posts showing that parcel is faster than webpack. |
Every question in this thread aside from "can you publish the benchmark app from the readme" has not been answered. Since the benchmarks in the README are the most visible to users of the project, it seems reasonable to use a public app to ensure that a fair comparison was made. Now that parcel is older, in addition to the above unanswered questions I would like to know:
|
This looks really shifty and although Parcel looks like good tech, this particular issue really taints it in my mind. Why not just write another benchmark? I wouldn't mind doing so myself. When I look at benchmarks like this it jus makes me think the authors of Parcel are being straight up disingenuous. |
Implement workerize transformer Approved-by: Will Binns-Smith
Merge v2 2020-12-08 Approved-by: Brian Do
I'd love for the app the README benchmarks are based on to be published, so that these can be analyzed and improved.
Personally, any time I see benchmarks I want to see:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: