This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Possible solution for memory leak: #267
We can move running task read write part to cloud function (https://cloud.google.com/functions). Cloud function are serverless compute instances which starts and tears down for each invokation. So memory leak issue will not arise.
Long running script will just invoke cloud function with blockIndex.
To test on local:
Start task runner/cloud function:
Start long running loop:
long running loop will invoke cloud function with incrementing blockIndex. Cloud function will execute and tear down releasing memory. Invokation rate will be at the speed of block production.