-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 693
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Monorepo should only build polkadot
by default
#1418
Labels
I3-annoyance
The node behaves within expectations, however this “expected behaviour” itself is at issue.
Comments
s0me0ne-unkn0wn
added
the
I3-annoyance
The node behaves within expectations, however this “expected behaviour” itself is at issue.
label
Sep 6, 2023
Done in #1420 |
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…aritytech#1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
bkchr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…1418) * fix XCM instruction weight in RialtoParachain to match Millau weight * fix spelling
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
I3-annoyance
The node behaves within expectations, however this “expected behaviour” itself is at issue.
Related: #1372
What does a user expect when he runs
cargo build -r
in the root of the repo? Does he expectmalus
,xcm-fuzzer
, andpuppet_worker
to be built, as it happens right now? I guess not. Most probably, he wants the Polkadot node software. If he needs to buildmalus
, he better specify that explicitly. Building only Polkadot by default would dramatically decrease build times and improve the UX for those who only want to build the node from sources, which I believe to be the most frequent use case.The proposal is to introduce
default-members
in the root manifest to only buildpolkadot
binary and auxiliary worker binaries.Besides a single-line change in the manifest, that should include proper documentation changes for different use cases of monorepo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: