Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Increase timeout for check-runtime-migration workflow #4674

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

alvicsam
Copy link
Contributor

@alvicsam alvicsam commented Jun 3, 2024

[check-runtime-migration now takes more than 30 minutes. Quick fix with increased timeout.

@alvicsam alvicsam requested review from a team as code owners June 3, 2024 11:51
@alvicsam alvicsam added the R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes label Jun 3, 2024
.github/workflows/checks-quick.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alvicsam alvicsam added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit cbe4512 Jun 3, 2024
154 of 155 checks passed
@alvicsam alvicsam deleted the as-ci-runtime-timeout branch June 3, 2024 14:09
ordian added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
* master:
  Add READ_ONLY flag to contract call function  (#4418)
  Format the README.md files (#4688)
  Typos in template README (#4687)
  [ci] Increase timeout for check-runtime-migration workflow (#4674)
hitchhooker pushed a commit to ibp-network/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
…h#4674)

`[check-runtime-migration` now takes more than 30 minutes. Quick fix
with increased timeout.
TarekkMA pushed a commit to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
…h#4674)

`[check-runtime-migration` now takes more than 30 minutes. Quick fix
with increased timeout.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants