Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Implement a series of parachain examples that start from easy and progress towards advanced implementations #5

Open
1 of 3 tasks
adrianbrink opened this issue Aug 19, 2018 · 4 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Implement a series of parachain examples that start from easy and progress towards advanced implementations #5

adrianbrink opened this issue Aug 19, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@adrianbrink
Copy link

adrianbrink commented Aug 19, 2018 •
edited
Loading

A folder with parachain examples would make it easier for new developers to pick up substrate as well as understand the logic behind deploying a parachain to Polkadot.

The examples should increase in difficulty and complexity. Furthermore, they should be built with Substrate.
@adrianbrink adrianbrink mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2018
Closed
@EdwardAThomson
Copy link

Maybe add a direct link to Rob's addr code? https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/master/parachain/tests/adder.rs

@rphmeier
Copy link
Contributor

rphmeier commented Nov 26, 2018 •
edited
Loading

With substrate 1.0-beta approaching this is probably possible to tackle starting soon.

We will want a substrate-consensus-polkadot implementation which runs a light client (we are blocked on Aura/GRANDPA light clients being implemented in this case). Also to add/limit WASM APIs used within Polkadot parachain-validation code.

@adrianbrink
Copy link
Author

Okay great.

@thomasmodeneis
Copy link

any news here ? would be nice to have the other examples linked here if they already exist. Cheers.

tomusdrw pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2021
@dependabot-preview
Bump sp-trie from 1fa3f7f to d78534e (#5)
0c978f6 
Bumps [sp-trie](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate) from `1fa3f7f` to `d78534e`.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/releases)
- [Commits](paritytech/substrate@1fa3f7f...d78534e)

Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <[email protected]>
@rphmeier rphmeier mentioned this issue Aug 24, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@thomasmodeneis @rphmeier @adrianbrink @EdwardAThomson